Mobile epifauna is an essential component of rocky reef ecosystems. In spite of this and the great scientific interest that the study of marine caves has aroused in the last decades, little research has been conducted on the macrofauna associated with animal substrates in submarine caves. This study explores the main differences between marine caves and open habitats in terms of species composition and diversity patterns of epifaunal communities in 4 different shallow marine caves in southern Spain. Colonies of Eudendrium sp., a marine hydroid widely distributed in the Mediterranean Sea, were taken from inside and outside each cave, and all associated mobile fauna were sorted and identified. More than 90% of organisms were crustaceans, with Amphipoda as the dominant group. Although the main species did not vary significantly in abundance between open and cave habitats, multivariate analysis carried out for the entire amphipod community showed significant differences between these 2 habitats. nMDS analysis showed that marine cave assemblages were also characterized by a higher degree of individuality, and univariate analysis showed a decrease in Shannon diversity and species richness with distance into the caves, a consistent pattern for all caves studied. Although the possible role of predation pressure in the structure of such assemblages was also discussed, we propose that the absence of plant substrates inside the caves, in conjunction with oligotrophic conditions and low siltation, are the main factors responsible for the impoverishment of the epifaunal community. The near lack of photosynthetic activity reduced the presence of herbivorous species, while the rich detritus-feeder community supported by the animal substrates was limited by the low rate of sedimentation.
KEY WORDS: Epifauna · Marine caves · Amphipods · Hydroids · Mediterranean SeaResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher Aquat Biol 20: 101-109, 2014 2009, Janssen et al. 2013). However, only a few of these studies have taken into account the epifaunal community inhabiting animal or plant substrates (Ledoyer 1966, True 1970, Scipione et al. 1981. Thus, this type of assemblage remains poorly known, although it is essential to consider this part of the marine cave community in order to understand the behavior of these systems. Epifauna associated with hard-bottom substrates are major contributors to the flux of materials in rocky habitats, providing up to 99% of total secondary productivity, and acting as a prey source for the majority and most productive demersal fishes (Taylor 1998a, Edgar & Aoki 1993. However, they have usually been excluded in trophic models (Taylor 1997).Although a decrease in species richness, diversity and coverage of benthic organisms is a well-known phenomenon in the inner part of marine caves (Zabala et al. 1989, Bussotti et al. 2006, the existence of the same pattern for the epifaunal community has not been tested. The presence of sessile species has a positive effect on ...