Variation of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in streams of three landscapes of South Brazilian grasslands

Abstract

Introduction: Aquatic ecosystems in southern Brazil are presently under great environmental pressure. Changes in land use result in negative impacts on the ecosystem, affecting the functioning of stream communities. Objective: To compare the benthic macroinvertebrate community richness, abundances and compositions in streams of three South Brazilian grassland landscapes and correlate community patterns with environmental and spatial variables. Methods: Fifteen streams along riparian forests were selected in three landscapes (mean geographical distance of 285.1 km) inserted in the Paraná and Uruguai river basins. Of the three landscapes, two are inserted in conservation units (State Park of Guartelá and Palmas Wildlife Refuge). Invertebrates were collected in 20 kick net points along 150 m of the streams between June and November 2015. Invertebrates were sorted in the laboratory with three sieves and were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. The taxa were classified in functional feeding groups of shredders/detritivores, predators, scrapers, collectors/filters and gatherers/collectors. For each stream, we measured the environmental variables width and velocity, pH, dissolved oxygen, and temperature; and the relative cover of forest, grassland, plantation and silviculture in the catchments. Results: We found a total of 1 058 individuals, divided in 53 morphospecies and 34 families. Lower abundance of benthic macroinvertebrates was found in the northernmost landscape with higher temperature, and forest in the catchment. These streams were described mainly by predator groups, while streams inserted in the other two landscapes showed a more diverse guild composition of shredders/detritivores, gatherers/collectors, collectors/filterers, and scrapers. Geographical distance was the main factor influencing differences in community compositions among landscapes. Conclusions: Lower abundance of the northernmost landscape may be explained by (i) the low habitat heterogeneity due to dominance of sandy substrates, and by (ii) the anthropogenic land use of agriculture and extensive cattle breeding in the region that is ongoing and started before the creation of the conservation unit. Additionally, composition of macroinvertebrates may be correlated with environmental differences among landscapes that, in turn, are related to the geographical distance. Therefore, macroinvertebrate community responses may reflect different biota biogeographical histories that can also be associated with historical land use practices.

The Role of Environmental, Land Use, and Spatial Factors in Macroinvertebrate Community Composition in Three River Basins in Ethiopia: A Variation Partitioning Analysis

“…The indirect effects of land use on changes in environmental in-stream characteristics are most often represented by the shared explanation of variation between land use and environmental factors. For example, (Galeti et al, 2020) showed that intensive agriculture might alter the physicochemical characteristics of the water and potentially impair the ecosystem (Wu, 2008) (Wu, 2008).…”

Land-use effects on aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in subtropical highland grasslands streams

“…Among these environments, highland grasslands of subtropical South America harbor high endemism (Barros et al, 2015). However, despite their high endemism, highland grasslands are threatened by high levels of habitat fragmentation and loss in southern Brazil (Barros et al, 2015;Iganci et al, 2011), where more than 50 % of natural grasslands have already been converted into distinct human land uses over last two decades (Magalhaes et al, 2016;Galeti et al, 2020). In this way, examination of the patterns of aquatic macroinvertebrate community composition in relation to environmental conditions and dispersal capacity by means of α and β diversities may be an important tool for evaluating the impacts of anthropogenic land uses on subtropical highland grasslands and for proposing conservation plans (Doretto et al, 2021;Mendes et al, 2021).…”

“…Overall, macroinvertebrates are a well-studied group in subtropical steams, with the diversity of the group being (i) negatively affected by anthropogenic land use (Barbola et al, 2011;Galeti et al, 2020;Tonello et al, 2021); (ii) pos-itively affected by oxygen concentration and high granulometry heterogeneity (Baptista et al, 2014); (iii) influenced by inter-annual temporal factors (Hepp et al, 2021); (iv) negatively affected by the input of leaf litter chemical compounds resulting from anthropogenic land uses (Loureiro et al, 2018(Loureiro et al, , 2021; and (v) highly similar between neighboring areas (i.e., local scale; Hepp & Melo, 2013;Hepp et al, 2021). It is noteworthy that most of these studies focused on forest streams and only a few studied the macroinvertebrate fauna of subtropical grasslands (Baptista et al, 2014;Hepp & Melo, 2013;Hepp et al, 2021;Loureiro et al, 2018Loureiro et al, , 2021Tonello et al, 2021), few of which were in highland grasslands (Galeti et al, 2020;, Montilla et al, 2022Principe et al, 2015). Similarly, subtropical highland grasslands have been understudied compared to tropical highland grasslands (Callisto et al, 2016(Callisto et al, , 2021Castro et al, 2019).…”