1984
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(84)90085-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of magnetic directions within pillow basalts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their calculations are suspect because they fly in the face of much of the recent evidence that CRM due to maghemitisation of fine-grained T M ~O preserves the original TRM direction. This evidence includes observations of NRM directions in variably oxidised pillow lavas from the seafloor (Soroka and Beske-Diehl 1984) as well as laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Recrystallisution Without Change Of Latticementioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, their calculations are suspect because they fly in the face of much of the recent evidence that CRM due to maghemitisation of fine-grained T M ~O preserves the original TRM direction. This evidence includes observations of NRM directions in variably oxidised pillow lavas from the seafloor (Soroka and Beske-Diehl 1984) as well as laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Recrystallisution Without Change Of Latticementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The nonglassy parts of basalt pillows show interesting trends of their own (Figure 13). Soroka and Beske‐Diehl [1984] compared companion cores taken from the coarser‐grained interior and the finer‐grained near surface of individual pillows. In almost all cases, lines joining pairs of points for the same pillow trend parallel to the magnetite or TM60 SD + MD mixing curves, in an upward direction consistent with finer average grain sizes toward the chilled margin of the pillow.…”
Section: Data For Oceanic Basalts and Glasses And Intrusive And Plutomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies of the effect of oxidation on the NRM directions in natural samples conclude that the resultant chemical remanent magnetization is acquired along the original TRM direction [Marshall and Cox, 1972; R yall and A de- Hall, 1975]. Differences between directions of the oxidized and unoxidized samples have been explained by a viscous remanent magnetization (VRM) acquired by the unoxidized material [Soroka and Beske-Diehl, 1984]. Results of the above studies are not diagnostic with regard to CRM, however, because the ages of most of the pillow basalts were less than 0.7 m.y.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%