The view seems to prevail that the frequency range of hearing is determined by the properties of the outer and middle ears. We argue that this view is an oversimplification, in part because the reactive component of cochlear input impedance, which affects the low-frequency sensitivity of the cochlea, is neglected. Further, we use comparisons of audiograms and transfer functions for stapes (or columella) velocity or pressure in scala vestibuli near the stapes footplate to show that the middle ear by itself is not responsible for limiting high-frequency hearing in the few species for which such comparisons are possible. Finally, we propose that the tonotopic organization of the cochlea plays a crucial role in setting the frequency limits of cochlear sensitivity and hence in determining the bandwidth of hearing.T his article has two purposes. The first is to argue that the often-stated notion that the shape of the audiogram is largely due to the frequency-filtering properties of the external and middle ears is an oversimplification. That notion neglects the fact that a reactive component of cochlear input impedance decreases the low-frequency sensitivity of the cochlea. More importantly, comparisons of behavioral thresholds and the magnitudes of stapes (or columella) velocity (V) or pressure in scala vestibuli near the stapes footplate (P SV ) reveal that the middle ear does not limit highfrequency hearing in the few species for which such comparisons are possible. The second purpose is to offer the hypothesis that the tonotopic organization of the cochlea makes a crucial contribution to setting the frequency limits of inner-ear responses and hence the bandwidth of hearing thresholds.
Historical OverviewWhen it became evident that ''high-frequency hearing is . . . a uniquely mammalian characteristic'' (1), there was speculation on the physiological and phylogenetic origins of the frequency limitations of hearing. According to one view, high-frequency hearing in mammals ''depends on the ossicular linkage in the middle ear and may have been one of the primary sources of selective pressure that resulted in the evolutionary transformation of reptilian jaw bones into mammalian auditory ossicles'' (1). A more inclusive perspective was that ''the ossicular chain of the mammalian ear is not the only factor involved in the high-frequency sensitivity of mammals'' (2), and it was suggested that the high-frequency limit of hearing across species is well correlated with an index derived from the length and width of the basilar membrane (BM; ref.3).On the basis of theoretical considerations, it was postulated long ago that cochlear input impedance is resistive at most frequencies and that reactive components affect cochlear responses only at very low (e.g., Ͻ3-10 Hz) and very high (4, 5) frequencies, thus playing a very minor role in determining the bandwidth of hearing. However, a significant role for the cochlea in setting the low-frequency limit of hearing became evident when microphonics data suggested that cochlear input im...