1984
DOI: 10.1063/1.447356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of nuclear magnetic shielding with intermolecular interactions and rovibrational motion. VII. 19F in CF2H2, CF2HCl, CFHCl2, CF2Cl2, and CFCl3

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inVariation of nuclear magnetic shielding with intermolecular interactions and rovibrational motion. IX. 1 9F in F2C=CH2 and F2C=CF2 Variation of chemical shielding with intermolecular interaction and rovibrational motion. V. 15N in N2Variable density and temperature studies offtuorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance spectra in the title molecules reveal the effects of intermolecular interactions, quantitatively expressed as a second virial coefficient of nuclear shielding 0'1 (T) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because Smith and Raynes did not report their pressure range, it could be that an ideal gas assumption was not valid, and thus their density values are in error for CHF 3 , which contributes to the difference in the values reported in Table for the 1 H of CHF 3 . In Table , the 19 F value for CHF 3 of −150.1 ppm cm 3 mol -1 compares well with the literature value, whereas the 19 F value for CH 3 F appears lower than the literature value of −307.1 ppm cm 3 mol -1 reported by Jameson et al , Earlier work by Meinzer reports a 19 F value for CH 3 F of −451.2 ppm cm 3 mol -1 . Our 19 F value for CH 3 F of −518.0 ppm cm 3 mol -1 compares favorably with this value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because Smith and Raynes did not report their pressure range, it could be that an ideal gas assumption was not valid, and thus their density values are in error for CHF 3 , which contributes to the difference in the values reported in Table for the 1 H of CHF 3 . In Table , the 19 F value for CHF 3 of −150.1 ppm cm 3 mol -1 compares well with the literature value, whereas the 19 F value for CH 3 F appears lower than the literature value of −307.1 ppm cm 3 mol -1 reported by Jameson et al , Earlier work by Meinzer reports a 19 F value for CH 3 F of −451.2 ppm cm 3 mol -1 . Our 19 F value for CH 3 F of −518.0 ppm cm 3 mol -1 compares favorably with this value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…b Experimental value reported by Smith and Raynes at 20 °C 4 Experimental 19 F σ 1 and (ppm cm 3 mol -1 ) Values for Neat CH 3 F and CHF 3 as a Function of Temperature temp (°C)σ 1 ± σ a b 19 F CH 3 F 30.0 −429.6 ± 8.3 −518.0 ± 7.3 −307.1 ± 40 60.0 −380.7 ± 11.9 −469.1± 10.2 90.0 −326.5 ± 1.6 −414.9 ± 7.0 120.0 −312.8 ± 1.7 −401.2 ± 7.2 150.0 −299.0 ± 1.2 −387.4 ± 6.9 19 F CHF 3 30.0 −31.6 ± 1.5 −150.1 ± 5.6 −152.4 ± 15 60.0 −21.1 ± 0.5 −139.6 ± 3.3 90.0 −19.0 ± 1.0 −137.5 ± 4.4 120.0 −18.1 ± 2.2 −136.6 ± 6.7 a The values displayed in Table are calculated using the bulk molar magnetic susceptibility reported by Jameson et al for ease of comparison. χ m for CH 3 F is −21.1 ppm cm 3 mol -1 , and χ m for CHF 3 is −28.3 ppm cm 3 mol -1 .
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, extensive studies of gas to liquid NMR shifts over a wide range of temperatures in simple molecules have established that the 19 F chemical shifts varied with temperature, uniformly decreasing as the density of the liquid decreases with increasing temperature. [52][53][54][55][56][57] The temperature dependence of Xe chemical shifts has been measured in some liquids. 8,16 The MD simulations in the present work provide the theoretical paradigm for the understanding of all such data.…”
Section: A Dependence On Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%