1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02261069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of retention index of a solute due to the presence of a large neighboring peak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small variations in retention times were attributed to random errors and matrix effects. For example, there is documented evidence that small peaks eluting in the neighborhood of a large peak are subject to largeneighboring peak effects, which cause them to elute somewhat differently [20]. It has been hypothesized that the smaller peaks see a stationary phase that is a mixture of the real or original stationary phase and the large peak.…”
Section: -01mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small variations in retention times were attributed to random errors and matrix effects. For example, there is documented evidence that small peaks eluting in the neighborhood of a large peak are subject to largeneighboring peak effects, which cause them to elute somewhat differently [20]. It has been hypothesized that the smaller peaks see a stationary phase that is a mixture of the real or original stationary phase and the large peak.…”
Section: -01mentioning
confidence: 99%