2020
DOI: 10.5194/soil-6-179-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of soil organic carbon, stable isotopes, and soil quality indicators across an erosion–deposition catena in a historical Spanish olive orchard

Abstract: Abstract. This study compares the distribution of bulk soil organic carbon (SOC), its fractions (unprotected and physically, chemically, and biochemically protected), available phosphorus (Pavail), organic nitrogen (Norg), and stable isotope (δ15N and δ13C) signatures at four soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–40 cm) between a nearby open forest reference area and a historical olive orchard (established in 1856) located in southern Spain. In addition, these soil properties, as well as water stable aggrega… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These and the further observed shifts in soil physiochemical properties between foot-slope and up-slope are in agreement with literature reports, therewith emphasizing the profound potential of slope position in explaining soil edaphic heterogeneity including soil organic C (Lal, 2003;Mayer et al, 2018), moisture (Western et al, 2004), texture (Xu et al, 2016), total C and N, C/N ratio as well as pH (Seibert et al, 2007) at our study site. The erosion/deposition processes reduce the physical protection of SOC at eroding sites and simultaneously accumulate higher C and N contents at the depositional footslope sites (Gómez et al, 2020;Shi et al, 2019). This can explain the higher MWC% and MWN% values determined at our foot-slope plots…”
Section: Topography Induced Shifts In the Soil Abiotic Properties And...mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…These and the further observed shifts in soil physiochemical properties between foot-slope and up-slope are in agreement with literature reports, therewith emphasizing the profound potential of slope position in explaining soil edaphic heterogeneity including soil organic C (Lal, 2003;Mayer et al, 2018), moisture (Western et al, 2004), texture (Xu et al, 2016), total C and N, C/N ratio as well as pH (Seibert et al, 2007) at our study site. The erosion/deposition processes reduce the physical protection of SOC at eroding sites and simultaneously accumulate higher C and N contents at the depositional footslope sites (Gómez et al, 2020;Shi et al, 2019). This can explain the higher MWC% and MWN% values determined at our foot-slope plots…”
Section: Topography Induced Shifts In the Soil Abiotic Properties And...mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this study, the moist composite field samples were air dried and passed through a 1 mm sieve for the analysis of soil pH, CaCl 2 -P, available P (AP), water-soluble K, Ca, and Mg and exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg. The samples were then passed through a 0.15 mm sieve for SOC and TN analysis (Yan et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2014;Gómez et al, 2020). Soil analysis methods for specific parameters and their corresponding soil size preparation standards (described previously) were used in this study (Lu, 2000).…”
Section: Soil Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a). A higher frequency of tillage operation generally results in the breakup of soil macro-aggregates, soil structure damage (Chivenge et al, 2007;Pires et al, 2017;Six et al, 2000;Gómez et al, 2020), and an increase in soil aeration, which promotes the microbial decomposition of SOC (Sarker et al, 2018). Accelerated SOC decomposition by high air temperatures and soil moisture levels in subtropical regions has been reported (Zhang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Soc and N Stocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations