1964
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.36.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of the Critical Fields of Superconducting Lead with the Residual Resistivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was often attributed to defects and insufficient sensitivity of magnetometers (see, e.g. [13]) and therefore ignored in theories (e.g., [14]). Saint-James and de Gennes treated superconductivity above H c2 as an equilibrium property, thus providing an interpretation of the entire phase diagram within one theory.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was often attributed to defects and insufficient sensitivity of magnetometers (see, e.g. [13]) and therefore ignored in theories (e.g., [14]). Saint-James and de Gennes treated superconductivity above H c2 as an equilibrium property, thus providing an interpretation of the entire phase diagram within one theory.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2A, and SI Appendix, Figs. S3-S5) (5)(6)(7)(8). Single crystals of the same doping from different batches and grown by different groups show similarly high irreversible magnetic fields…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…T h e rather involved analysis of their results led these authors to conclude that equation (2.40) and the theoretical expression for K l ( t ) / K were verified to within about 4%. I n fact, the precision of the observations which are now becoming available is approaching the point where it might be worth while using the exact equation ( 2 (Livingston (1963) for various lead I alloys, Druyvesteyn et al (1964) for lead-indium alloys, Joiner and Blaugher (1964) for molybdenum-rhenium alloys, Rosenblum et al (1964) for niobium alloys, Kinsel et al (1962) for indium-bismuth alloys and DeSorbo (1963 a) for niobium alloys) merely indicate that ~~( t ) and K l ( t ) did not differ by more than about 2076 for these specimens. There was therefore a corresponding lack of precision in the verification of the equation K ~( 1) = K ~( 1) which must hold at temperatures where the GL equations are valid.…”
Section: Mixedmentioning
confidence: 99%