2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of wood density and hydraulic properties of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) clones related to a heat and drought wave in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The vulnerability to cavitation can vary significantly for these different structures (Sperry and Tyree, 1990;Mayr and Cochard, 2003) and it is likely that the cavitation mechanism also differs between them (Domec and Gartner, 2002). Because the hydraulic conductivity of latewood and reaction wood tracheids is normally very low, our vulnerability curves should predominantly indicate the vulnerability of the large earlywood tracheids (Dalla-Salda et al, 2009). Hence, the tested mechanisms in our experiments are only relevant for the cavitation of earlywood tracheids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vulnerability to cavitation can vary significantly for these different structures (Sperry and Tyree, 1990;Mayr and Cochard, 2003) and it is likely that the cavitation mechanism also differs between them (Domec and Gartner, 2002). Because the hydraulic conductivity of latewood and reaction wood tracheids is normally very low, our vulnerability curves should predominantly indicate the vulnerability of the large earlywood tracheids (Dalla-Salda et al, 2009). Hence, the tested mechanisms in our experiments are only relevant for the cavitation of earlywood tracheids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WD has also been reported to vary along elevation and latitudinal gradients, which represent proxies for environmental conditions (Chave et al 2009;Dalla-Salda et al 2009). Clearly, variation in WD across species represents a nexus of various physiological, ecological and environmental interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tyree and Ewers (1991) interpreted this hypothesis as the vulnerability segmentation hypothesis, suggesting that distal tissues are more vulnerable to embolism than proximal tissues to prevent embolism events in the main stem axis. While roots were found to be more resistant to embolism than stems in Populus and Juglans species Hukin et al 2005), other intra-plant studies showed that roots and trunks were less resistant to embolism than branches (Sperry and Ikeda 1997;Martínez-Vilalta et al 2002;Domec et al 2006;Dalla-Salda et al 2009;McCulloh et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Franco, for instance, reported P 50 varies from −2.45 to −6.3 MPa for branches, from −1.3 to −4.7 MPa for trunk segments, and from −1 to −3.8 MPa for roots (Sperry and Ikeda 1997;Martínez-Vilalta et al 2002;Domec et al 2006;Dalla-Salda et al 2009;McCulloh et al 2014). This discrepancy between studies could be due to the use of different sub-species that may differ in their habitat and vulnerability to embolism, or to the use of different hydraulic techniques that are applied to measure embolism resistance: air injection (Sperry and Ikeda 1997;Martínez-Vilalta et al 2002;Domec et al 2006;McCulloh et al 2014), the centrifuge flow method (Dalla-Salda et al 2009), dehydration (Domec et al 2006), and ultrasonic acoustic emissions (McCulloh et al 2014). In addition, various techniques have been used to compare organs of a single tree within a single study (McCulloh et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%