1996
DOI: 10.1071/ar9960985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation within Stylosanthes sp. aff. scabra and comparison with its closest allies, S. scabra and S. hamata

Abstract: Forty Stylosanthes scabra, S. hamata, and S. sp. aff. scabra lines were grown at CSIRO Lansdown Research Station, North Queensland. Morphological features were grouped with the numerical classification program PATN. Agronomical attributes were recorded and analysed for each group. The resulting 5 groups were largely homogeneous by species. Seed colour, the presence of leaf bristles and stipule horn lateral bristles, stem and inflorescence viscidity, growth habit, and stem length and thickness were important fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clade 3 is formed by the diploid species S. calcicola, S. macrocarpa, and S. seabrana, all diploid specimens of S. hamata and S. mexicana, some of the tetraploid specimens of S. hamata that we studied, and the tetraploid species S. sundaica. A close relationship between these diploid species and populations is in agreement with both morphological conclusions (Blake 1920, Mohlenbrock 1958, Jansen and Edye 1996) and results of a previous cpDNA sequence analysis (Vander Stappen et al 1999a, Vander Stappen andVolckaert 1999). With the exception of S. seabrana, which is restricted to eastern Brazil, the species of clade 3 have their distribution in the northern Neotropics and/or the mainland of northeastern South America, which corresponds in part to the secondary centre of diversity of the genus.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Entire Its Region Insupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Clade 3 is formed by the diploid species S. calcicola, S. macrocarpa, and S. seabrana, all diploid specimens of S. hamata and S. mexicana, some of the tetraploid specimens of S. hamata that we studied, and the tetraploid species S. sundaica. A close relationship between these diploid species and populations is in agreement with both morphological conclusions (Blake 1920, Mohlenbrock 1958, Jansen and Edye 1996) and results of a previous cpDNA sequence analysis (Vander Stappen et al 1999a, Vander Stappen andVolckaert 1999). With the exception of S. seabrana, which is restricted to eastern Brazil, the species of clade 3 have their distribution in the northern Neotropics and/or the mainland of northeastern South America, which corresponds in part to the secondary centre of diversity of the genus.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Entire Its Region Insupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With the exception of S. seabrana, which is restricted to Bahia in eastern Brazil, these species occur in the Mexican-Caribbean basin and/ or the mainland of northeastern South America (Mohlenbrock 1958), which corresponds in part to the secondary centre of diversity of the genus. Morphologically they are similar and they are adapted to different environments (Mohlenbrock 1958;Jansen and Edye 1996;Gama López, in preparation). According to Stace and Cameron (1984), these species were primarily distributed in the northern Neotropics, and during the Pleistocene they migrated to the southern Neotropics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…O gênero Stylosanthes compreende aproximadamente 50 espécies e subespécies que são preferencialmente herbáceas. A taxonomia do gênero é complexa e ainda persistem dúvidas quanto à sua filogenia (Curtis et al, 1995;Gillies & Abbott,1996;Glover et al, 1994;Jansen & Edye, 1996;Liu et al, 1996;Vander Stappen et al, 1998;Vieira et al, 1997).…”
Section: O Gênero Stylosanthesunclassified