2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational contact symmetries of constrained Lagrangians

Abstract: The investigation of contact symmetries of re-parametrization invariant Lagrangians of finite degrees of freedom and quadratic in the velocities is presented. The main concern of the paper is those symmetry generators which depend linearly in the velocities. A natural extension of the symmetry generator along the lapse function N (t), with the appropriate extension of the dependence inṄ (t) of the gauge function, is assumed; this action yields new results. The central finding is that the integrals of motion ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We start by constructing the point-like Lagrangian of f (T ) gravity. Starting from the usual action S = d 4 x |e| f (T ) + S m , and following [447][448][449][450][451], one can define a canonical Lagrangian L = L(a,ȧ, T,Ṫ ), with Q = {a, T } the configuration space and T Q = {a,ȧ, T,Ṫ } the related tangent bundle on which L is defined. The scale factor a(t) and the torsion scalar T (t) are taken as independent dynamical variables, and hence one can use the Lagrange mutipliers method in order to set T as a constraint of the dynamics (recall that T = −6H…”
Section: Cosmological Solutions By Noether Symmetry Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start by constructing the point-like Lagrangian of f (T ) gravity. Starting from the usual action S = d 4 x |e| f (T ) + S m , and following [447][448][449][450][451], one can define a canonical Lagrangian L = L(a,ȧ, T,Ṫ ), with Q = {a, T } the configuration space and T Q = {a,ȧ, T,Ṫ } the related tangent bundle on which L is defined. The scale factor a(t) and the torsion scalar T (t) are taken as independent dynamical variables, and hence one can use the Lagrange mutipliers method in order to set T as a constraint of the dynamics (recall that T = −6H…”
Section: Cosmological Solutions By Noether Symmetry Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, one can also find higher order generators, i.e. irreducible tensor Killing fields leading to new conserved quantities that do not reduce to the first order ones [28]. An important quantity is the Casimir invariant which commutes with all the Q i 's 16) and is constructed by an element of the universal enveloping algebra spanned by ξ i 's.…”
Section: Classical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum Casimir operator iŝ 27) which in this case does not coincide with the kinetic part of the Hamiltonian constraint as it happens in most of the cases we study. The corresponding eigenvalue equation iŝ 28) which is Hermitian under the same measure µ as the other operators. The result is…”
Section: Subalgebraqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symmetries have always played a fundamental role in physical theories. In recent years there exists an increased interest on the subject of Noether point and/or generalized symmetries of physical systems and their geometric nature [1]- [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, one can discern two approaches regarding the treatment of symmetries in minisuperspace systems: The first entails an a priori fixation of the gauge (usualy N = 1) at the Lagrangian level and the treatment of the ensuing system as if it were regular ( [8]- [12]). The second method ( [6], [7], [13], [14]) utilizes the gauge invariance of parametrization invariant systems, resulting in the emergence of larger symmetry groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%