2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5020655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational nonadiabatic dynamics in the moving crude adiabatic representation: Further merging of nuclear dynamics and electronic structure

Abstract: A new methodology of simulating nonadiabatic dynamics using frozen-width Gaussian wavepackets within the moving crude adiabatic representation with the on-the-fly evaluation of electronic structure is presented. The main feature of the new approach is the elimination of any global or local model representation of electronic potential energy surfaces; instead, the electron-nuclear interaction is treated explicitly using the Gaussian integration. As a result, the new scheme does not introduce any uncontrolled ap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New developments merging the ideas of vMCG, Ehrenfest dynamics, and the Exact Factorization are ongoing . The idea of moving beyond the use of a purely adiabatic electronic basis with traveling Gaussian functions has triggered interesting new work in the last years . Considerable efforts have been invested more recently in developing a robust algorithm for performing MCTDH on‐the‐fly .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New developments merging the ideas of vMCG, Ehrenfest dynamics, and the Exact Factorization are ongoing . The idea of moving beyond the use of a purely adiabatic electronic basis with traveling Gaussian functions has triggered interesting new work in the last years . Considerable efforts have been invested more recently in developing a robust algorithm for performing MCTDH on‐the‐fly .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…155 The idea of moving beyond the use of a purely adiabatic electronic basis with traveling Gaussian functions has triggered interesting new work in the last years. [156][157][158][159] Considerable efforts have been invested more recently in developing a robust algorithm for performing MCTDH on-the-fly. 160 Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics combined with machine-learning strategies for the calculation of electronic-structure quantities has recently emerged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47][48][49] We should emphasize that historically, the QD scheme was introduced to propagate the electronic amplitudes in surface hopping simulations, which is commonly referred as the "local diabatic" basis approach. 18,61,62,64,65 It has also been used in scattering probability calculations 66 and recently, gaussian wave packet dynamics approaches, [67][68][69][70][71] and is referred as the "moving crude adiabatic" scheme. 71 In the QD propagation scheme, we expand the scope of this idea by using it as a general framework to interface any diabatic trajectory-based dynamics methods with routinely available adiabatic electronic structure information.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,61,62,64,65 It has also been used in scattering probability calculations 66 and recently, gaussian wave packet dynamics approaches, [67][68][69][70][71] and is referred as the "moving crude adiabatic" scheme. 71 In the QD propagation scheme, we expand the scope of this idea by using it as a general framework to interface any diabatic trajectory-based dynamics methods with routinely available adiabatic electronic structure information. Thus, it opens up many possibilities to use recently developed di-abatic dynamics methods 38,39,41,42,44,72,73 for nonadiabatic on-the-fly simulations.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the readily available electronic structure information in the adiabatic representation, quantum dynamics approaches formulated in this representation have been extensively used to perform on-the-fly NAMD simulations, including the popular fewest-switches surface hopping (FSSH) (4,(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), ab-initio multiple spawning (AIMS) (3,7,16), and several recently developed Gaussian wavepacket approaches (17)(18)(19)(20)(21), coupled-trajectory approaches (22)(23)(24)(25), and the ab-initio multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) (26,27). Among them, FSSH is one of the most popular approaches in NAMD, which uses mixed quantum-classical (MQC) treatment of the electronic and nuclear DOFs that provides efficient non-adiabatic simulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%