2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/ac8fd8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational resolution of outflow boundary conditions for incompressible Navier–Stokes

Abstract: This paper focuses on the so-called weighted inertia-dissipation-energy variational approach for the approximation of unsteady Leray–Hopf solutions of the incompressible Navier–Stokes system. Initiated in (Ortiz et al 2018 Nonlinearity 31 5664–82), this variational method is here extended to the case of non-Newtonian fluids with power-law index r ⩾ 11/5 in three space dimension and large nonhomogeneous data. Moreover, boundary conditions are not imposed on some parts of boundaries, represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, as the velocity profile on Γ out is not known in advance, it is not logical to prescribe Dirichlet's boundary condition for u$\mathbf {u}$ on Γ out . What is an appropriate boundary condition on the outflow has been a subject of discussions in literature, see for example, [1–5, 10, 11, 15, 16, 23], and so forth. We use the condition badbreak−ν0.16embolduboldngoodbreak+pboldn0.33emgoodbreak=0.33emboldhgoodbreak+1+ξ20.16emfalse(boldu·boldnfalse)0.16emboldu2emon0.33emΓout,$$\begin{equation} -\nu \, \frac{\partial \mathbf {u}}{\partial \mathbf {n}}+p \mathbf {n}\ =\ \mathbf {h}+ \frac{1+\xi }{2}\, (\mathbf {u}\cdot \mathbf {n})_-\, \mathbf {u}\qquad \mbox{on}\ \Gamma _{\rm out}, \end{equation}$$where n$\mathbf {n}$ denotes the outward normal vector, ξ is a positive parameter and the subscript “−” denotes the negative part.…”
Section: Introduction the Main Theorem And Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, as the velocity profile on Γ out is not known in advance, it is not logical to prescribe Dirichlet's boundary condition for u$\mathbf {u}$ on Γ out . What is an appropriate boundary condition on the outflow has been a subject of discussions in literature, see for example, [1–5, 10, 11, 15, 16, 23], and so forth. We use the condition badbreak−ν0.16embolduboldngoodbreak+pboldn0.33emgoodbreak=0.33emboldhgoodbreak+1+ξ20.16emfalse(boldu·boldnfalse)0.16emboldu2emon0.33emΓout,$$\begin{equation} -\nu \, \frac{\partial \mathbf {u}}{\partial \mathbf {n}}+p \mathbf {n}\ =\ \mathbf {h}+ \frac{1+\xi }{2}\, (\mathbf {u}\cdot \mathbf {n})_-\, \mathbf {u}\qquad \mbox{on}\ \Gamma _{\rm out}, \end{equation}$$where n$\mathbf {n}$ denotes the outward normal vector, ξ is a positive parameter and the subscript “−” denotes the negative part.…”
Section: Introduction the Main Theorem And Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%