2010
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drp040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational-splitting time integration of the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree-Fock equations in electron dynamics

Abstract: We discuss the numerical approximation of the solution to the multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree-Fock (MCTDHF) equations in quantum dynamics. The MCTDHF method approximates the high-dimensional wave function of the time-dependent electronic Schrödinger equation by an antisymmetric linear combination of products of functions depending only on three-dimensional spatial coordinates. The equations of motion, obtained via the Dirac-Frenkel time-dependent variational principle, consist of a coupled system of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the second-order Peano kernel K 2 (σ) = 1 2 σ(σ − 1) of the trapezoidal rule we further get Proof. As in the proof of Proposition 3.6, we start from (24). Using (14b) with β = 0, we estimate as in that proof…”
Section: Proof Of the Higher Order Error Bounds In Lower Order Sobolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the second-order Peano kernel K 2 (σ) = 1 2 σ(σ − 1) of the trapezoidal rule we further get Proof. As in the proof of Proposition 3.6, we start from (24). Using (14b) with β = 0, we estimate as in that proof…”
Section: Proof Of the Higher Order Error Bounds In Lower Order Sobolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) and (8) has been the source of several theoretical and numerical studies over the past years. Splitting of the orbital equation by separating the onebody, stiff kinetic energy terms from the two-body, local, nonstiff potential terms has received considerable attention [51][52][53], but we do not pursue this avenue here.…”
Section: Numerical Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the two-stage arguments used in [9,10,26,32,33], the proof of Theorem 3.3 will be divided into two parts. We will first show the proof of the lower-order error bounds in higher-order Sobolev spaces (i.e., −1 ≤ α ≤ 0) in Section 4, and then present the proof of the higher-order error bounds in lower-order Sobolev spaces (i.e., 0 < α ≤ 1) in Section 5.…”
Section: Remark 34mentioning
confidence: 99%