2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00508.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Belowground Carbon Storage and Soil CO2 Flux Rates along a Wet Tropical Climate Gradient1

Abstract: We used a humid tropical elevation gradient to examine the relationships among climate, edaphic conditions, belowground carbon storage, and soil respiration rates.We also compared open and closed canopy sites to increase the range of microclimate conditions sampled along the gradient, and determine the effects of canopy openings on C and P storage, and C dynamics. Total soil C, the light C fraction, and all of the component fractions of the P pool were significantly related to soil moisture, and all but total … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have no data on the soil porosity of the monitoring plots, and the available data on the soil physical properties (Table 1) do not explain the reason for the trend in water content. However, the responses of soil respiration to soil water condition, as expressed by the exponential quadratic functions, seem to be reasonable for the upper slope because under a soil water condition of nearsaturation, soil respiration is often depressed by the increase in the water-filled pore space (Doff sotta et al 2004;Kang et al 2003) or by the decline in microbial activity due to the oxygen deficit (McGroddy and Silver 2004;Skopp et al 1990). Similar results were found in the other areas of Thailand; depression of soil respiration occurred under high soil moisture content over 0.21 (Adachi et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussion Spatial Variation In Soil Respiration Rate On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have no data on the soil porosity of the monitoring plots, and the available data on the soil physical properties (Table 1) do not explain the reason for the trend in water content. However, the responses of soil respiration to soil water condition, as expressed by the exponential quadratic functions, seem to be reasonable for the upper slope because under a soil water condition of nearsaturation, soil respiration is often depressed by the increase in the water-filled pore space (Doff sotta et al 2004;Kang et al 2003) or by the decline in microbial activity due to the oxygen deficit (McGroddy and Silver 2004;Skopp et al 1990). Similar results were found in the other areas of Thailand; depression of soil respiration occurred under high soil moisture content over 0.21 (Adachi et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussion Spatial Variation In Soil Respiration Rate On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, soil N in both forests is relatively high and plant productivity has not responded to added N in either site (Cusack et al 2011). Upper elevation soils also have relatively lower soil redox potential (Silver et al 1999), and higher bulk soil phosphorous (P) (McGroddy and Silver 2000) compared with the lower elevation sites.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient cycling in both forests is generally not at steady-state because of the frequent occurrence of severe tropical storms and hurricanes (Heartsill-Scalley et al 2010;Scatena et al 1993;Silver et al 1996). Despite significant similarities, background soil N levels, climate and soil type vary between the two sites (McGroddy and Silver 2000). Both forests were included to assess heterogeneity in base cation responses to N addition in different tropical forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total Fe in these extracts was quantified on an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, USA). Phosphorus (P) was quantified following Tiessen and Moir (1993) with two exceptions: (1) the resin P step was omitted because the concentrations are typically very low for these forest soils (McGroddy and Silver 2000), and (2) fresh soils were extracted to prevent any binding of P via Fe oxidation during the air drying process. Labile P was quantified with a NaHCO 3 extraction followed by a sequential extraction with 0.1 M NaOH to quantify the P associated Al or Fe (Al/Fe P).…”
Section: Field and Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reduction of Fe(III) can liberate P from Fe-P bonds increasing P availability (Baldwin and Mitchell 2000, Peretyazhko and Sposito 2005, Chacon et al 2006. Soil P pools vary across environmental gradients, and circumstantial evidence provides linkages with redox (Schimel et al 1985, McGroddy and Silver 2000, Litaor et al 2005, Mage and Porder 2013. For example, P availability generally increases when soils become saturated (Ponnamperuma 1972) and temporal changes in labile P associated with the onset of the rainy season in seasonal tropical rain forests has been linked to changes in redox (Vandecar et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%