2014
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egu065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Fe3+/∑Fe of Mariana Arc Basalts and Mantle Wedge fO2

Abstract: When collecting Fe-µ-XANES spectra on olivine-hosted melt inclusions, it is important to avoid hitting the olivine crystal with the beam during analysis. Olivine contains several weight percent of Fe 2+ and even a very small amount of olivine interference will "contaminate" the pre-edge structure of Fe-µ-XANES spectra collected for melt inclusions and bias the result towards more reduced values. The region of XANES spectra at higher energies than the Fe-Kα absorption edge contains information related to Fe-coo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

18
160
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(28 reference statements)
18
160
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The IMI-30 was deployed in two main survey areas-along the Malaguana Gadao Ridge (MGR), the magmatically inflated southern Mariana backarc seafloor spreading center (Becker et al, 2010), and the SEMFR area ( Figure 2) at the eastern end of the rifted margin. Stern, P. Fryer, K. Kelley, and Y. Ohara. Results of the geochemical sampling in the SEMFR area and surrounding margin are reported in , , Ribeiro et al (2015Ribeiro et al ( , 2017, and Brounce et al (2014). Geophysical results from the MGR and its westward continuation as the diffuse spreading zone (DSZ) extending to the Southwest Mariana Rift (SWMR, Figure 2) are reported in a manuscript in preparation: "Diffuse spreading, a new mode of crustal accretion in the southern Mariana Trough backarc basin" by J. D. Sleeper, F. Martinez, R. J.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMI-30 was deployed in two main survey areas-along the Malaguana Gadao Ridge (MGR), the magmatically inflated southern Mariana backarc seafloor spreading center (Becker et al, 2010), and the SEMFR area ( Figure 2) at the eastern end of the rifted margin. Stern, P. Fryer, K. Kelley, and Y. Ohara. Results of the geochemical sampling in the SEMFR area and surrounding margin are reported in , , Ribeiro et al (2015Ribeiro et al ( , 2017, and Brounce et al (2014). Geophysical results from the MGR and its westward continuation as the diffuse spreading zone (DSZ) extending to the Southwest Mariana Rift (SWMR, Figure 2) are reported in a manuscript in preparation: "Diffuse spreading, a new mode of crustal accretion in the southern Mariana Trough backarc basin" by J. D. Sleeper, F. Martinez, R. J.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods indicate that Mariana arc basalts are generally ~1-2 log units more oxidised compared to Icelandic basalts from Hekla (e.g., de Moor et al, 2005;Moune et al, 2007;Brounce et al, 2014;Shorttle et al, 2015). We chose forty whole rock samples from three well-studied lava suites: 1) primitive arc lavas of the Mariana Central Island Province (CIP; Elliott et al, 1997), 2) co-genetic lavas from Anatahan volcano in the Mariana arc (Wade et al, 2005) and 3) co-genetic lavas from Hekla volcano, Iceland (Savage et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to explain how oxidised arc basalts and more reduced MORBs can be derived from sources with similar fO 2, processes subsequent to magma generation such as degassing and crystal fractionation have been invoked (e.g., Mallmann and O'Neill, 2009;Lee et al, 2010). Evidence gleaned from both experimental and natural suites is conflicting, with cases of Fe 3+ /∑Fe increasing, decreasing and remaining invariant during magmatic degassing and crystallisation (e.g., Brounce et al, 2014;Waters and Lange, 2016). Thus lingering uncertainty as to whether the elevated Fe 3+ /∑Fe in arc lavas is derived from their sources or during differentiation fuels continued debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of fO 2 of Archean magmas are not this low, arguing for alternative explanations for the oxygenation of the atmosphere. /ΣS), than midocean ridge basalt (MORB) magmas (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Based on the known relationships between Fe 3+ /ΣFe, S 6+ /ΣS, oxygen fugacity (fO 2 ), and melt composition (8,9) and on recent observations that Fe 3+ /ΣFe of subduction-related magmas are only weakly dependent on factors such as crystal−liquid fractionation and degassing (7,10,11), the higher Fe 3+ /ΣFe ratios of arc and back-arc basalts relative to MORBs have been attributed by most authors to elevated fO 2 in their mantle sources resulting from addition of oxidized hydrous fluids or silicate melts from subducted slabs (7,11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/ΣS), than midocean ridge basalt (MORB) magmas (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Based on the known relationships between Fe 3+ /ΣFe, S 6+ /ΣS, oxygen fugacity (fO 2 ), and melt composition (8,9) and on recent observations that Fe 3+ /ΣFe of subduction-related magmas are only weakly dependent on factors such as crystal−liquid fractionation and degassing (7,10,11), the higher Fe 3+ /ΣFe ratios of arc and back-arc basalts relative to MORBs have been attributed by most authors to elevated fO 2 in their mantle sources resulting from addition of oxidized hydrous fluids or silicate melts from subducted slabs (7,11,12). Ocean island basalts (OIBs) are more variable in fO 2 , with Fe 3+ /ΣFe and S 6+ /ΣS ratios that range from lower than to higher than MORBs (4,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), but it is unclear whether these differences relate to variable amounts of ancient, more oxidized subducted material in the mantle sources of OIB (e.g., ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%