Together with the Federal Highway Administration, the South Dakota Local Technical Assistance Program published a manual on unpaved roads (3). This manual asks 10 questions to determine the real need to improve or change existing pavement and suggests the best type of road pavement.Smadi et al. summarize several research efforts that have examined alternative approaches to reduce gravel road maintenance costs (4). These potential solutions may generally be classified as• Modifying the gravel surface of high-traffic roads (i.e., paving or using chemical additives),• Reducing maintenance on gravel roads with low traffic volume, and• Closing unnecessary gravel roads.The decision as to which strategy to consider must be based on sound engineering, financial, and legal analysis. The authors illustrate how effective public involvement (user buy-in) is a key factor in the decision-making process. Rukashaza-Mukome et al. used data gathered from numerous Minnesota counties to investigate spending on low-volume road maintenance and claim that their data enabled county and local governments to make informed decisions about when it may be economically advantageous to upgrade and pave aggregate roads (5). The activities examined included maintenance grading, regraveling, dust control or stabilization, reconstruction or regrading, paving, and associated maintenance activities. The expected end product was a set of modifiable relationships to address local conditions, including the calculated cumulative maintenance cost per mile. These relationships are expected to show how the maintenance costs of aggregate, lightly surfaced, and hot-mix asphalt (HMA) roads vary by surface type, age, and traffic.Wolters et al. present a method based on a life-cycle cost analysis considering both agency costs and user costs (crash costs and vehicle operating costs only) in an analysis of four surface types (HMA, blotter, stabilized gravel, and gravel) from an economic point of view (6). Based on the default models developed from an analysis of agency costs only, the average daily traffic levels should be 0 to 150 vehicles/day for gravel, 150 to 660 vehicles/day for blotter, and more than 660 vehicles/day for HMA surfaces. The authors hold that the consideration of user costs and other noneconomic factors may affect decisions about which surface type is most appropriate for a given traffic level and may be taken into account using the method developed during this project. The use of the method is facilitated by using a manual process outlined in a standalone technical brief or an automated spreadsheet tool.Werkmeister and Alabaster present a practical method for estimating the remaining pavement life of LVRs that uses falling weight deflectometer (FWD) measurements (7). The method was developed For many years, much research has been carried out to assess the affordability of paving a road. Now, increased construction and maintenance costs for traditional asphalt pavement systems have persuaded many civil administrations, regional councils, and a...