2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Perioperative Warfarin Management: Outcomes and Practice Patterns at Nine Hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They include phenprocoumon, warfarin, and acenocoumarol. In elective perioperative settings, these drugs are replaced by UFH, LMWH, or fondaparinux, as these periods are associated with a thromboembolic risk of 0-2 % if VKA are interrupted (Mourelo et al 2008 ) and a bleeding risk of 2-25 % if VKA are continued during surgery (Jaffer et al 2010 ). There are several ways to reverse the anti-vitamin K effect.…”
Section: Vitamin K Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include phenprocoumon, warfarin, and acenocoumarol. In elective perioperative settings, these drugs are replaced by UFH, LMWH, or fondaparinux, as these periods are associated with a thromboembolic risk of 0-2 % if VKA are interrupted (Mourelo et al 2008 ) and a bleeding risk of 2-25 % if VKA are continued during surgery (Jaffer et al 2010 ). There are several ways to reverse the anti-vitamin K effect.…”
Section: Vitamin K Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the studies were of poor methodological quality, with poorly described bridging strategies, making conclusions difficult to interpret. Since publication of that systematic review, there have been multiple moderatesized and multicentre prospective cohort studies assessing bridging anticoagulation in over 7,169 patients after VKA interruption for elective procedures or surgeries (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). These studies included well-described patient groups on VKA, well-described procedures, a specified bridging protocol (usually with LMWH) with well-defined follow-up periods and validated and objectively verified study outcomes, including ATE, venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and death (ǠTable 1).…”
Section: Clinical Data On Bridging Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic-dose LMWH (and UFH) has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared with low-dose LMWH or UFH regimen or no bridging (OR: 4.4; 95% CI: 1.5-14.7) in a prospective multicenter registry. 5 Consequently, its perioperative use should be judicious and tailored to the type of surgery so as to minimize bleeding risk.…”
Section: If Warfarin Therapy Is Stopped When Is Heparin Bridging Reqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Added to these varied perceptions of thromboembolic risk is the wide range of surgical and other invasive procedures that patients undergo and clinicians' differing perceptions of associated bleeding risk. 5,6 Overall, the perceived risk for thromboembolism will likely drive patient management, 6 and if it is perceived to be greater than the risk for bleeding, this will determine whether heparin bridging is administered during warfarin interruption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%