1988
DOI: 10.1176/ps.39.4.418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Seclusion and Restraint Practices by Hospital Location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different national legislation and practices in use of coercive measures during treatment are challenges in comparative studies [13,28,42]. Coercive measures during hospitalization in this study are defined as seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different national legislation and practices in use of coercive measures during treatment are challenges in comparative studies [13,28,42]. Coercive measures during hospitalization in this study are defined as seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical characteristics of ward, size of ward, double or single rooms, crowding and patient turnover [12,13,18,21,24-26]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1990). A frequent consequence of threats of, or acts of violence, is the use of coercion (seclusion/restraint) by hospital staff (Soloff & Turner 1981, Thompson 1986, Carpenter et al . 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are therefore at times unprepared for the personal and professional consequences of these acts, such as staff members being less willing to work with potentially aggressive patients and unprepared to handle serious, albeit rare, events when they do occur. Moreover, lack of preparation and fear of harm is likely to increase the probability that staff members resort to the use of coercion, seclusion, and inappropriate pharmacological sedation and polypharmacy-options that in turn result in greater risk of adverse effects for patients (Thompson, 1986;Carpenter et al, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%