2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-021-10120-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in T2-Mapping-Assessed Area at Risk After Experimental Ischemia/Reperfusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current methods for evaluating the area at risk following I/R injury, which mainly include positron emission tomography /computed tomography with radionuclides such as sodium [18F] fluoride, [ 30 ] radionuclides labeled molecules with injured related phospholipids binding activities, [ 31 ] and T2‐weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (T2‐CMR). [ 32 ] Major limitations of the first two methodologies include adverse effects to hazardous ionizing radiation, intrinsically limited spatial resolutions, reconstruction‐dependent poor temporal resolution, high cost and lack of both exogenous and endogenous probes for molecular or functional imaging. [ 33 ] The T2‐CMR is based on the edema at the injured sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current methods for evaluating the area at risk following I/R injury, which mainly include positron emission tomography /computed tomography with radionuclides such as sodium [18F] fluoride, [ 30 ] radionuclides labeled molecules with injured related phospholipids binding activities, [ 31 ] and T2‐weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (T2‐CMR). [ 32 ] Major limitations of the first two methodologies include adverse effects to hazardous ionizing radiation, intrinsically limited spatial resolutions, reconstruction‐dependent poor temporal resolution, high cost and lack of both exogenous and endogenous probes for molecular or functional imaging. [ 33 ] The T2‐CMR is based on the edema at the injured sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native T1 mapping can identify myocardial fibrosis and quantify IS without utilizing gadolinium agents ( 13 15 ), which gives an estimate of IS for particular patient groups. A high T2 signal reflects an increased myocardial water content; T2 mapping is confirmed effective in assessing myocardial edema, which is considered as AAR in AMI ( 16 ). Comparing and quantifying T1 and T2 mapping ideally provide MSI and assess reperfusion efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%