2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the mineral structures dominating solute mobilization during clay compaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The muddy sand (−9.7-−6.0 m) and sandy clay (depth −14.9-−9.7 m) layers exposed by borehole C3 had a high sand content, strong permeability, and insufficient water-rock interactions. The main component of sandy minerals was SiO 2 , which did not absorb Fe ions and DOM-like negatively charged clay minerals [4], so the overall Fe and Fe 2+ concentrations of this layer were low (Figure 4).…”
Section: Vertical Distribution and Environmental Factors Influencing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The muddy sand (−9.7-−6.0 m) and sandy clay (depth −14.9-−9.7 m) layers exposed by borehole C3 had a high sand content, strong permeability, and insufficient water-rock interactions. The main component of sandy minerals was SiO 2 , which did not absorb Fe ions and DOM-like negatively charged clay minerals [4], so the overall Fe and Fe 2+ concentrations of this layer were low (Figure 4).…”
Section: Vertical Distribution and Environmental Factors Influencing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of aquitard on groundwater safety has raised widespread concern around the world [1][2][3][4]. The clayey sediment is a common aquitard in plains, formed by the evolution of loose surface sediments with a high moisture content [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%