1943
DOI: 10.2527/jas1943.23221x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the Occurrence of Bloat in the Steer Progeny of Beef Bulls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1948
1948
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common experience that some cows within a herd become repeatedly affected by bloat while others may never show a sign. There is also some evidence that the difference in reaction to bloatcausing environment is influenced by hereditary factors (Knapp, Baker & Phillips, 1943). As the present trials were time-repeated and as monozygotic twins were used (in Trials 1 and 4), they provided some information regarding the importance of individuality as a factor causing variation in bloat incidence.…”
Section: Individualitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is common experience that some cows within a herd become repeatedly affected by bloat while others may never show a sign. There is also some evidence that the difference in reaction to bloatcausing environment is influenced by hereditary factors (Knapp, Baker & Phillips, 1943). As the present trials were time-repeated and as monozygotic twins were used (in Trials 1 and 4), they provided some information regarding the importance of individuality as a factor causing variation in bloat incidence.…”
Section: Individualitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here, it must be recalled that tlie animal itself is also an important factor determmmg the development of bloat or enterotoxaemia. There is no doubt that susceptibility to these disorders varies with the individual and even the breed and strain or family (81). With regard to individual susceptibility, it is reasonably to expect an animal which has suffered depletion of protein reserves or Mver injury by infection, poisons, drugs, undernutrition, pregnancy or heavy lactation to be less resistant to " clover-poisoning " than an animal which has not so suffered.…”
Section: Bloat and Enterotoxaemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility to bloat in cattle is at least partly genetically controlled (Knapp et al 1943;Hancock 1954;Johns 1954;Johns et al 1958;Piper 1974;Clarke & Reid 1974). Further, there is evidence suggesting that, in dairy cows, susceptibility can be dissociated from productivity (Reid et al 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%