2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the slope of the resolved star-forming main sequence: a tool for constraining the mass of star-forming regions

Abstract: The correlation between galaxies' integrated stellar masses and star formation rates (the 'star formation main sequence'; SFMS) is a well-established scaling relation. Recently, surveys have found a relationship between the star formation rate and stellar mass surface densities on kpc and sub-kpc scales (the 'resolved SFMS'; rSFMS). In this work, we demonstrate that the rSFMS emerges naturally in FIRE-2 zoom-in simulations of Milky Way-mass galaxies. We make SFR and stellar mass maps of the simulated galaxies … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that the scatter increases both as a function of radius and as patch is decreased for all simulations. These trends are, at least qualitatively, consistent with scale-dependent sampling effects (e.g., Torrey et al 2017;Hani et al 2020). In particular, fewer star-forming complexes are contained within each patch on average with increasing radius and decreasing patch size.…”
Section: Pressure-to-weight Ratio Vs R and Zsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We find that the scatter increases both as a function of radius and as patch is decreased for all simulations. These trends are, at least qualitatively, consistent with scale-dependent sampling effects (e.g., Torrey et al 2017;Hani et al 2020). In particular, fewer star-forming complexes are contained within each patch on average with increasing radius and decreasing patch size.…”
Section: Pressure-to-weight Ratio Vs R and Zsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Ellison et al (2018a) report both downturns and upturns towards the smaller radii in their MaNGA-selected SFR profiles at low galactocentric radii for galaxies with SFR above and below their resolved (spaxel-by-spaxel) SFR-M relation (the 'rSFMS' -see e.g. Ellison et al 2018a;Hani et al 2020a). Wang et al (2019) find similar results with the same survey, but using the median SFR in stellar-mass bins (rather than the rSFMS) as reference.…”
Section: Global Sfr Enhancement Versus Radial Structurementioning
confidence: 59%
“…This observational study does not separate galaxies in terms of their location to the global SFMS -nor relative to non-interacting controls (in the case of pairs). Ellison et al (2018a) report both downturns and upturns towards the smaller radii in their MaNGA-selected Σ SFR profiles at low galactocentric radii for galaxies with SFR above and below their resolved (spaxel-by-spaxel) SFR-M relation (the 'rSFMS' -see e.g., Ellison et al 2018a;Hani et al 2020a). Wang et al (2019) find similar results with the same survey, but using the median Σ SFR in stellar-mass bins (rather than the rSFMS) as reference.…”
Section: Global Sfr Enhancement Versus Radial Structurementioning
confidence: 60%