1999
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.8.1974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in vaginal epithelial surface appearance determined by colposcopic inspection in healthy, sexually active women

Abstract: A total of 107 sexually active women, aged 18-35 years, was recruited through family planning clinics in four centres in different countries. Each woman underwent two or three gentle but thorough and systematic vaginal inspections using a consistent technique with colposcopic magnification over a 4-6 month period to look for changes in vaginal and cervical appearance which might be related to sexual intercourse, tampon use, contraceptive method used, cigarette smoking or other environmental factors. Obvious ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, CS does not appear to cause more epithelial disruption than K-Y. At least one colposcopic finding was observed in 60% of sexually abstinent women and in 47% of sexually active women, which was somewhat reversed from an earlier observational study in which colposcopic findings were seen in 25% of women examined within 24 h of vaginal intercourse compared with 14% of women who abstained [13]. It is possible that the gel provided some type of protection in sexually active women, although other possibilities are plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Thus, CS does not appear to cause more epithelial disruption than K-Y. At least one colposcopic finding was observed in 60% of sexually abstinent women and in 47% of sexually active women, which was somewhat reversed from an earlier observational study in which colposcopic findings were seen in 25% of women examined within 24 h of vaginal intercourse compared with 14% of women who abstained [13]. It is possible that the gel provided some type of protection in sexually active women, although other possibilities are plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…1,2,[9][10][11][12] All six of the studies investigated genital injuries after consensual intercourse either as part of larger study to investigate differences between consensual and non-consensual intercourse or to explore the efficacy of injury detection tools used following sexual assaults injury rates ranged from 5 to 61%. 10 Methodological differences made comparisons difficult.…”
Section: Genital Injuries After Consensual Intercoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies varied based on time from intercourse to examination, age ranges, tools used to identify injuries, and how participants were recruited. Time from intercourse to examination ranged from 0-6 h; 10 0-24 h 1,2 and greater than 24 h. [9][10][11][12] The group seen within 6 h of intercourse 10 had the highest injury rate (61%). By increasing time from intercourse to examination to 24 h, two studies reported injury rates of 11% 10 and 30%.…”
Section: Genital Injuries After Consensual Intercoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proportion of injury is similar to those found by other investigators in the consensual sex population (Lauber & Souma, 1982;Slaughter et al, 1997). Fraser and colleagues followed 107 sexually active women, age 18 to 35 years, over a 6-month period to look for changes in vaginal and cervical appearance (Fraser et al, 1999). In 3.5% of the 314 inspections, investigators found a total of 11 abnormalities: 3 ulcerations, 2 ecchymoses, 5 abrasions, and 1 tear.…”
Section: Is Injury Prevalence Following Consensual Sexual Intercoursementioning
confidence: 99%