2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations of Ant Colony Optimization for the Solution of the Structural Damage Identification Problem

Abstract: In this work the inverse problem of identification of structural stiffness coefficients of a damped spring-mass system is tackled. The problem is solved by using different versions of Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) metaheuristic solely or coupled with the Hooke-Jeeves (HJ) local search algorithm. The evaluated versions of ACO are based on a discretization procedure to deal with the continuous domain design variables together with different pheromone evaporation and deposit strategies and also on the frequency o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PSO was selected due to its almost similar characteristics with GSA and its application in the similar type of sputtering process [23][24][25], while GA was selected due to its adaptation in other type of sputtering processes [26][27][28]. As for AIS and ACO, these algorithms have been adapted in various engineering parameter optimization problems [29][30][31][32]. All of the algorithms were executed 30 times, with their average fitness values and processing times recorded as shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSO was selected due to its almost similar characteristics with GSA and its application in the similar type of sputtering process [23][24][25], while GA was selected due to its adaptation in other type of sputtering processes [26][27][28]. As for AIS and ACO, these algorithms have been adapted in various engineering parameter optimization problems [29][30][31][32]. All of the algorithms were executed 30 times, with their average fitness values and processing times recorded as shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern search method of Hooke-Jeeves (HJ) [13] is a well known algorithm consisting of the repeated application of exploratory moves about a base point which, if successful, is followed by pattern moves. HJ have been used in some hybrid algorithms solving the damage identification problem, such as AS+HJ [14], qG-HJ [7], and MPCA-HJ [6,8].…”
Section: Hooke-jeeves Pattern Search Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixing the values for discrete design variables and then updating the optimal values only for continuous design variables by performing SQP on the approximation model The end of Step Two Figure 3 Flowchart for the coordinate search technique in Step Two (3) Hooke-Jeeves direct search technique (Kolda et al 2003, Garcia et al 2006, Brauna et al 2015, Liu 2016), a more robust approach than the first two algorithms, can more efficiently and effectively exploit the design space of discrete variables for the optimal solutions. The flowchart for the Hooke-Jeeves direct search technique is depicted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Startmentioning
confidence: 99%