2005
DOI: 10.19182/remvt.9942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations saisonnières de l’oestrus et de l’ovulation chez la chèvre locale Maure en Tunisie

Abstract: Un total de 22 chèvres Maures tunisiennes ont permis de caractériser les variations saisonnières des activités d’oestrus et d’ovulation sur une période de 14 mois. Durant la période expérimentale, les chèvres ont été maintenues non gravides. Elles ont été conduites sur des parcours naturels et ont reçu un apport constant en concentré de 200 g par chèvre et par jour. En outre, elles ont été exposées à une photopériode naturelle et maintenues en présence continue des boucs. Des boucs munis de tabliers ont été ut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, ovulation rate after application of the ‘PGF’ and ‘GnRH’ treatments are low which would lessen the number of born kids and meat productivity/female. These values are not comparable to what has been obtained with the ‘S’ protocol because the latter uses eCG, but in any case, they are much lower that the breed average which is over 1.5 (Lassoued and Rekik ). One possible explanation for these discrepancies is the fact that experiment 2 took place during the transition period to the breeding season, which is a physiological stage when the ovarian function and oestrous expression are characterized by several irregularities (Chemineau et al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, ovulation rate after application of the ‘PGF’ and ‘GnRH’ treatments are low which would lessen the number of born kids and meat productivity/female. These values are not comparable to what has been obtained with the ‘S’ protocol because the latter uses eCG, but in any case, they are much lower that the breed average which is over 1.5 (Lassoued and Rekik ). One possible explanation for these discrepancies is the fact that experiment 2 took place during the transition period to the breeding season, which is a physiological stage when the ovarian function and oestrous expression are characterized by several irregularities (Chemineau et al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, goats in experiment 1 were all in sexual inactivity as none of them was found with ovulatory activity. Such conclusion is backed by the published seasonal patterns of reproduction for the same breed (Lassoued and Rekik ), indicating that all the goats are in anoestrus during the period of late May–early June. In contrast, 46% of goats in experiment 2 were depicting ovulatory activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For some of these goats, re-initiation of postpartum ovarian activity in late winter-early spring coincided with the transitional phase between the natural breeding season and seasonal anoestrous (Lassoued and Rekik, 2005). It is perhaps the same reason explaining that 9 and 7 goats of respectively the C and PEG treatment groups ovulated only once and then elapsed into anoestrus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ηδίσο ε αλεπαξθήο δηαηξνθή είλαη ζπρλά ππεχζπλε γηα ηελ εκθάληζε παξαηεηακέλσλ άλνηζηξσλ πεξηφδσλ θαη πεξηφδσλ ρσξίο σνζπιαθηνξξεμίεο, γηα ηε κείσζε ηεο γνληκφηεηαο θαη ηεο πνιπδπκίαο, ελψ παξάιιεια πξνθαιεί έλαλ απμαλφκελν ξπζκφ εκβξπηθήο ζλεζηκφηεηαο(Delgadillo et al, 1997).Ζ θαιχηεξε θαη πην επηζπκεηή πεξίνδνο γηα ηηο νρείεο φζν θαη γηα ηηο γελλήζεηο εμαξηάηαη ηφζν απφ ηε δηαζεζηκφηεηα ηεο ηξνθήο φζν θαη απφ ηνπο θιηκαηηθνχο θαη δηαρεηξηζηηθνχο παξάγνληεο. Έηζη, ζε νξηζκέλεο πεξηπηψζεηο ε πξφθιεζε ηνπ νίζηξνπ ζεσξείηαη πσο πξέπεη λα ζπκβαίλεη θαηά ηελ πεξίνδν ησλ βξνρνπηψζεσλ ησλ κνπζψλσλ ψζηε νη γελλήζεηο λα ιάβνπλ ρψξα κεηά ηελ πεξίνδν ησλ κνπζψλσλ(Lassoued and Rekik, 2005;Moaeen-ud-Din et al, 2008). ηηο αίγεο πνπ εθηξέθνληαη ζηηο ηξνπηθέο πεξηνρέο φπσο είλαη νη Creole ζηε Γνπαδεινχπε παξαηεξείηαη κηα θαηαλνκή ησλ γελλήζεσλ θαζ" φιε ηε δηάξθεηα ηνπ έηνπο σο απνηέιεζκα ηεο κε χπαξμεο επνρηθφηεηαο αλαπαξαγσγήο.Χζηφζν, ππάξρεη κηα απμεκέλε ηάζε γελλήζεσλ θαηά ηελ άλνημε ελψ ιηγφηεξεο ιακβάλνπλ ρψξα ην θζηλφπσξν.…”
unclassified