1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70154-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varicose vein surgery with preservation of the saphenous vein: A comparison between high ligation-avulsion versus saphenofemoral banding valvuloplasty-avulsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, regardless of the treatment technique, it is logical to contemplate a long-term follow-up for the patients treated for varices, with the adaptation of the procedures and the choice of techniques on a case-by-case basis and with the abandonment of invariable and needlessly destructive treatments. [44][45][46][47] Within this context, the choice of a treatment limited to phlebectomy-even in the presence of saphenous reflux-may be the first-line treatment apart from the evolved stages because it is minimally invasive, focuses on the varicose reservoir, and respects the saphenous axis, whose recuperative potential-as our study has shown-is far from negligible. Preservation of the SV, whose physiologic role may perhaps have been discounted, should be an important factor in the long-term management of varicose disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, regardless of the treatment technique, it is logical to contemplate a long-term follow-up for the patients treated for varices, with the adaptation of the procedures and the choice of techniques on a case-by-case basis and with the abandonment of invariable and needlessly destructive treatments. [44][45][46][47] Within this context, the choice of a treatment limited to phlebectomy-even in the presence of saphenous reflux-may be the first-line treatment apart from the evolved stages because it is minimally invasive, focuses on the varicose reservoir, and respects the saphenous axis, whose recuperative potential-as our study has shown-is far from negligible. Preservation of the SV, whose physiologic role may perhaps have been discounted, should be an important factor in the long-term management of varicose disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it would prevent formation of varicose veins. For this reason, various devices including Dacron-reinforced silicone cuffs (Venocuff™, Imthage Bio-Research Analysis Facility, NSW, Australia), polyethylene terephthalate, and thermomechanically expanded PTFE have been developed 6–9. We have used PTFE-covered nitinol frames (Gore and Associates, Inc.) for a long period of time and have not encountered any allergic reaction to the implanted material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sie verglichen bei 32 Patienten die Ergebnisse beider Methoden mit dem klinischen Schweregrad der CVI. Es fanden sich in der deszen-Therapie Die Therapie der Wahl bei einer Stammvarikose des oberflächlichen Venensystems besteht heute unbestritten in Krossektomie und Stripping des varikösen Stammes mit Ligatur aller weiteren insuffizienten Perforantes [4,18]. Lediglich bei der Beurteilung einer Klappeninsuffizienz im tiefen Venensystem ist die deszendierende Phlebographie der FCDS überlegen.Von Masuda et al [13] wurde untersucht, welche Refluxdauer, gemessen mit der FCDS bei einer mit der deszendierenden Phlebographie nachgewiesenen Klappeninsuffizienz zu beobachten ist.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified