2010
DOI: 10.1626/pps.13.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varietal Differences in Photosynthetic Rates in Rice Plants, with Special Reference to the Nitrogen Content of Leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed differences in the relationship of gas exchange parameters are attributed to genotypes and are in good agreement with findings of Hirasawa et al, (2010) which highlights the genotypic differences in photosynthetic rate of flag leaves. Flag leaf photosynthesis revealed a good correlation with root biomass of the varieties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The observed differences in the relationship of gas exchange parameters are attributed to genotypes and are in good agreement with findings of Hirasawa et al, (2010) which highlights the genotypic differences in photosynthetic rate of flag leaves. Flag leaf photosynthesis revealed a good correlation with root biomass of the varieties.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We demonstrated previously that a high-yielding indica variety, Takanari, had a higher LPR, which was due to a higher leaf nitrogen content (Xu et al, 1997;Ohsumi et al, 2008;Hirasawa et al, 2010), and therefore, to a higher Rubisco content at a given level of nitrogen application, and due to the greater stomatal conductance of each leaf at a given level of leaf nitrogen, than in common japonica varieties (Hirasawa et al, 2010). In the present study, the LPR in the highyielding indica variety, Habataki, was higher by approximately 30% to 40% than that in the japonica variety, Sasanishiki.…”
Section: Causes Of Varietal Differences In Lprmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…LNC is closely correlated with leaf Rubisco content, and one of the most important parameters on photosynthesis (Evans, 1989;Hirasawa et al, 2010;Makino et al, 1992). There are significant varietal differences in LNC in rice cultivars even under the same N fertilizer treatment (Hirasawa et al, 2010;Kanemura et al, 2007). LNC of Shennong265 was higher than that of Nipponbare or Takanari at the same rate of N application (Table 2, 4).…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Rubisco concentration is closely related to V cmax , and leaf Rubisco content is a key factor of the limitation of CO 2 assimilation (Farquhar et al, 1980). LNC is closely correlated with leaf Rubisco content, and one of the most important parameters on photosynthesis (Evans, 1989;Hirasawa et al, 2010;Makino et al, 1992). There are significant varietal differences in LNC in rice cultivars even under the same N fertilizer treatment (Hirasawa et al, 2010;Kanemura et al, 2007).…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%