2014
DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2014.894344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varieties in developing sustainability: the case of the Israeli kibbutz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may be explained by the wide ideological gap between people belonging to these two statuses, which highlights their differing chosen ways of life in the very same communities in rural areas. Furthermore, Palgi and Getz () suggest that the kibbutz's power to decide who will be admitted into both statuses is a specific factor that endangered community social cohesion. In summary, we find a clear trend suggesting that kibbutzim that did not become involved in the privatization process had more improvement in the indices of sustainability than kibbutzim that adopted the organizational and demographic changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result may be explained by the wide ideological gap between people belonging to these two statuses, which highlights their differing chosen ways of life in the very same communities in rural areas. Furthermore, Palgi and Getz () suggest that the kibbutz's power to decide who will be admitted into both statuses is a specific factor that endangered community social cohesion. In summary, we find a clear trend suggesting that kibbutzim that did not become involved in the privatization process had more improvement in the indices of sustainability than kibbutzim that adopted the organizational and demographic changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severe economic crisis in the kibbutzim during the 1980s forced kibbutz members to ask serious questions about their worldview and way of living and challenged the fundamental communal principles of their community. Indeed, it has been argued that the communal way of life and the manner in which it is expressed on a daily basis constitute a major challenge to the sustainability of the kibbutz (Palgi & Getz, ; Rosner & Getz, ; Talmon, ). However, most kibbutz members preferred to transform the kibbutz and the way the community was managed, rather than abandon their home (Ben‐Rafael, ; Rosner & Getz, ).…”
Section: Renewing Kibbutzimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are returning to the community but not to the commune. The sustainability of the community is now the top priority of the kibbutz (Palgi & Getz, 2014).…”
Section: S Getzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pioneers of the kibbutzim advocated collective ownership of homes and land, collective labor and collective child-rearing, an ambitious endeavor to create an oasis free of the capitalist mode of production. The socialist impetus was married to Zionist ideals of creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine (Abramitzky 2011;Palgi and Getz 2014;Kahana 2015).…”
Section: The Form Of the Kibbutzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meant a shift from manufacturing to services, knowledge economy, and finance capital; weakening trade unions; enhanced global trade and speculative "risk investments," including reduced trade-barriers and increasing imports; enhanced emphasis on consumption; individual contracts replacing collective contracts and similar developments familiar from other countries. The process of kibbutz privatization was thus not just a reaction to the debt in conditions of limited alternatives, but also a response to pressures by the government and to demands by some of the kibbutz members to synchronize the structure of the kibbutz with the times and changed values (Palgi and Getz 2014;Ashkenazi and Katz 2009). Already in 1983, sociologist Melford Spiro identified a transition in kibbutz culture and structure from asceticism to consumption, from closed community to a porous, pluralist collectivity, from a focus on external ends (socialism, Zionism) to a focus on the kibbutz itself (Spiro 1983).…”
Section: Privatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%