1978
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90241-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varieties of mutualistic interaction in population models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
117
1
3

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
117
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Classic mutualism models predict evolutionary instability of mutualist phenotypes, either because mutualists experience increased extinction risk [10,[17][18][19] or because cheater mutants can invade mutualist populations and drive transitions from mutualism to parasitism [14,15]. Yet, our data are inconsistent with these models.…”
Section: (C) the Evolutionary Diversification Of Proteobacterial Mutucontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Classic mutualism models predict evolutionary instability of mutualist phenotypes, either because mutualists experience increased extinction risk [10,[17][18][19] or because cheater mutants can invade mutualist populations and drive transitions from mutualism to parasitism [14,15]. Yet, our data are inconsistent with these models.…”
Section: (C) the Evolutionary Diversification Of Proteobacterial Mutucontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Yet, the latter comparisons were sensitive to taxon sampling and were significant in only approximately 60% of the sampling schemes (see the electronic supplementary material, S6), so these conclusions are preliminary. Finally, classic theory predicted that mutualists are particularly vulnerable to extinction [17,18], but MuSSE inferred that both mutualists and parasites exhibit similarly elevated extinction rates compared to free-living taxa (figure 3; electronic supplementary material, S6). We recognize the uncertainty in estimating extinction rates from phylogenies [30], so we treat this conclusion with some caution.…”
Section: (D) Evolution and Diversification Of Proteobacterial Mutualistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Obvious examples include the algal-fungal associations of lichens [8], plant-pollinator interactions [12], seed dispersal systems that rely on animal vectors [19], the legume nitrogen-fixing bacteria interactions [1,13], and damselfish-sea anemone interactions [23]. Mutualism may be obligate or facultative, but models of obligate mutualism have qualitatively different stability properties from those of facultative ones (see [24]). An obligate mutualist is a species which requires the presence of another species for its survival, e.g., some species of Acacia require the ant P seudomyrmex in order to survive (see [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%