2017
DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2017.1374183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varieties of vigilantism: conceptual discord, meaning and strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Haas, de Keijser and Bruinsma (2014) also defined vigilantism as: ‘a planned criminal act, carried out by a private citizen in response to (the perceived threat of) a crime committed by a private citizen, targeting the (alleged) perpetrator of that crime’ (p.226). While the notion of planning or premeditation is emphasised in these definitions of vigilantism, there is recognition that vigilante acts may also be spontaneous as in the case of mob justice (Martin 2010; Moncada 2017). Drawing on these conceptualisations, vigilantism can be defined as a premeditated or spontaneous act involving the use or threat of violence by individuals who do not possess official legitimate power in response to an alleged criminal act or a behaviour that violates the norms associated with an institutionalised order (Haas, Keijser and Bruinsma 2012; Moncada 2017; Tankebe 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haas, de Keijser and Bruinsma (2014) also defined vigilantism as: ‘a planned criminal act, carried out by a private citizen in response to (the perceived threat of) a crime committed by a private citizen, targeting the (alleged) perpetrator of that crime’ (p.226). While the notion of planning or premeditation is emphasised in these definitions of vigilantism, there is recognition that vigilante acts may also be spontaneous as in the case of mob justice (Martin 2010; Moncada 2017). Drawing on these conceptualisations, vigilantism can be defined as a premeditated or spontaneous act involving the use or threat of violence by individuals who do not possess official legitimate power in response to an alleged criminal act or a behaviour that violates the norms associated with an institutionalised order (Haas, Keijser and Bruinsma 2012; Moncada 2017; Tankebe 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the notion of planning or premeditation is emphasised in these definitions of vigilantism, there is recognition that vigilante acts may also be spontaneous as in the case of mob justice (Martin 2010; Moncada 2017). Drawing on these conceptualisations, vigilantism can be defined as a premeditated or spontaneous act involving the use or threat of violence by individuals who do not possess official legitimate power in response to an alleged criminal act or a behaviour that violates the norms associated with an institutionalised order (Haas, Keijser and Bruinsma 2012; Moncada 2017; Tankebe 2009). While practices such as hanging, burning, shooting, and stoning are typically considered lethal, practices such as beating, whipping, and torture, which are considered non‐lethal (Moncada 2017), can have lethal outcomes depending on severity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions of vigilantism are contested. I adopt the following broad definition: “the collective use or threat of extra‐legal violence in response to an alleged criminal act” (Moncada 2017, 403).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosenbaum and Sederberg (1976) classic typology of vigilantism, for instance, lies upon motivational dimensions only, identifying crime control, social control, and regime control as the key points of conceptual variation. Theoretically, what has followed is a split over the nature of such motives, with most scholarship identifying vigilantism as inherently conservative or reactionary, whilst others have understood it as ideologically neutral or even progressive (Moncada, 2017). Whichever the perspective, collective action has generally been assumed wherever there is a collective interest demanding it, so long as the state tolerates it.…”
Section: Hipólito Mora Autodefensa Leader (La Ruana Michoacán)mentioning
confidence: 99%