2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2016.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variometric approach for real-time GNSS navigation: First demonstration of Kin-VADASE capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has to be stressed that this study aimed at estimating the wave parameters based on GNSS data analysis (see Section 2). Therefore, only the synthetic wave parameters were compared to the results of other research works, being the original methodology Kin-VADASE widely validated (see Section 2, [18]) even if applied to a different environment.The Alghero wave buoy belongs to the “RON-Rete Ondametrica Nazionale” (Italian Wave Measurements Network [26]), managed by ISPRA up to 2014 and now dismissed after about 23 years; the buoy was located offshore the northwest coast of Sardinia and it was exposed to the waves generated by the storm at hand. The six-hourly hindcast wave data provided in analysis by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) and the the hourly wave hindcast data provided by DICCA (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy), covering 36 (1979–2014) years over the Mediterranean Sea [27] were also considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has to be stressed that this study aimed at estimating the wave parameters based on GNSS data analysis (see Section 2). Therefore, only the synthetic wave parameters were compared to the results of other research works, being the original methodology Kin-VADASE widely validated (see Section 2, [18]) even if applied to a different environment.The Alghero wave buoy belongs to the “RON-Rete Ondametrica Nazionale” (Italian Wave Measurements Network [26]), managed by ISPRA up to 2014 and now dismissed after about 23 years; the buoy was located offshore the northwest coast of Sardinia and it was exposed to the waves generated by the storm at hand. The six-hourly hindcast wave data provided in analysis by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) and the the hourly wave hindcast data provided by DICCA (Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy), covering 36 (1979–2014) years over the Mediterranean Sea [27] were also considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Herbers et al [14] used off-the-shelf GPS receivers able to provide positions with accuracy limited to a few meters, mentioning that sub-meter accuracy is achievable with post-processing methodology only. In this work, we propose to adopt the original methodology Kin-Vadase, presented and widely validated by Branzanti et al [18], able to provide accuracies at decimeter level and at few millimeters/second for positions and velocities directly on-board, respectively (no need of external data, such as differential positioning or precise point positioning) and in real time. With respect to the work of De Girolamo et al [19], this paper deals with a more detailed description of the methods and extends the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the integration of acceleration to obtain displacement and velocity introduces low-frequency noise, which is commonly reduced with high-pass filters 24 . With HR-GNSS, displacements or velocities are directly obtained with proper observation processing, e.g., Precise Point Positioning (PPP) 2 , 25 or variometric approach (VAD, based on VADASE) 3 , 26 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a series of studies indicate that the conventional approaches have their pros and cons in velocimetry. For instance, the carrier phase-based approach, although with higher accuracy, outputs the betweenepoch average velocity [10,15]. Similarly, the position difference approach outputs the average velocity of between-epoch, with lower accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%