1986
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(86)90896-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varying brain insulin concentrations differentially regulate the fetal brain insulin receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in CSF insulin content had no effect on specific insulin binding sites in various areas of the brain. This is consistent with other in vivo studies showing that a three-to sixfold increase in cellular insulin content by exogenous insulin was without any effect on insulin binding sites in hypothalamus from the rat (Melnyk and Martin, 1984~) or brain from the rabbit fetus (Devaskar et al, 1986). Indeed, it has been shown that in vivo down-regulation of brain insulin receptors is not a physiologic, but a pharmacologic, effect of insulin detected in the rabbit fetus when the cellular insulin level was increased to > 130 ng/g (Devaskar et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Changes in CSF insulin content had no effect on specific insulin binding sites in various areas of the brain. This is consistent with other in vivo studies showing that a three-to sixfold increase in cellular insulin content by exogenous insulin was without any effect on insulin binding sites in hypothalamus from the rat (Melnyk and Martin, 1984~) or brain from the rabbit fetus (Devaskar et al, 1986). Indeed, it has been shown that in vivo down-regulation of brain insulin receptors is not a physiologic, but a pharmacologic, effect of insulin detected in the rabbit fetus when the cellular insulin level was increased to > 130 ng/g (Devaskar et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Again, no differences were observed, suggesting that the N-linked glycosylation did not regulate the ability to down-or up-regulate the fetal and adult liver IR in response to varying insulin concentrations. One could argue that the brain IR N-linked glycosylation failed to change, possibly due to a lack of change in brain insulin and/or insulin receptor number (5). However, the liver, which is exposed to circulating insulin concentrations, did not demonstrate a change in response to hormonal perturbations as well, negating this theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In spite of this persistence of IR heterogeneity in the embryo, fetus, and adult, the fetal IR has been demonstrated to be distinct in other respects from the adult IR, for example, the IR in various fetal tissues is higher in number/mg (38)(39)(40), fails in vivo to down-regulate in response to high circulating insulin concentrations (8)(9)(10) and mediates an immature biologic response of insulin (4 l), specifically with regard to hepatic glucose to glycogen conversion (41). Similarly, the brain IR fails to down regulate in response to insulin both in vivo (5) and in vitro (6) and mediates a unique biologic effect of insulin within the central nervous system (16,17). As suggested previously, if N-linked glycosylation were responsible for down-regulation of the IR, one would expect to see similar glycosylation patterns in the fetal and adult brain IR and the fetal liver IR alone (adult liver IR being different), because these receptors uniformly express an inability to down-regulate in response to insulin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fetuses were delivered by reopening the hysterotomy incision under pentobarbital anesthesia either 4 h (short term) or 24 h (long term) after laparotomy (31). Upon exposure of the uteri, using microinjection syringes (705NWG, Hamilton Co., Reno, Nevada) fetuses received regular crystalline (short term) or NPH isophane (long term) insulin injections (Sigma Diagnostics) either intracerebroventricularly (1 mU in 2 l vehicle) via the anterior fontanelle or ip (5 mU in 5 l vehicle) through the uterine wall while still maintaining an intact feto-placental unit within the uterus.…”
Section: Fetal Hyperinsulinism Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%