2019
DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular Access in Patients Treated with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Report from a Single Center in China

Abstract: Our aim was to analyze the practice pattern of vascular access use and complication rates in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy from a large Chinese urban medical center. Patients who had received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) from April to October 2014 in our center were included in this study. Demographic data, primary disease, department for hospitalization, blood pressure, heart rate, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another consideration in terms of the use of CRRT versus IHD is the fact that patients with ESRD who have a graft or fistula, which equates to 19.4% of USRDS patients, require a new vascular access to be placed before CRRT can be initiated 13. This invasive procedure in an already critically ill patient comes with potential risks including but not limited to arterial puncture, hemothorax, pneumothorax, thrombus formation, and pericardial tamponade, along with the downstream complication of a catheter-related bloodstream infection following line placement 15-19. Given the low incidence of these complications, it is hard to determine the extent to which catheter placement deters CRRT use for clinicians and may be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another consideration in terms of the use of CRRT versus IHD is the fact that patients with ESRD who have a graft or fistula, which equates to 19.4% of USRDS patients, require a new vascular access to be placed before CRRT can be initiated 13. This invasive procedure in an already critically ill patient comes with potential risks including but not limited to arterial puncture, hemothorax, pneumothorax, thrombus formation, and pericardial tamponade, along with the downstream complication of a catheter-related bloodstream infection following line placement 15-19. Given the low incidence of these complications, it is hard to determine the extent to which catheter placement deters CRRT use for clinicians and may be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 This invasive procedure in an already critically ill patient comes with potential risks including but not limited to arterial puncture, hemothorax, pneumothorax, thrombus formation, and pericardial tamponade, along with the downstream complication of a catheter-related bloodstream infection following line placement. [15][16][17][18][19] Given the low incidence of these complications, it is hard to determine the extent to which catheter placement deters CRRT use for clinicians and may be negligible. Placing a catheter, however, does take time and has the potential to delay treatment of patients following their stroke which may lead to further complications.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid overload was reported to be closely related to AKI occurrence, which was associated with the poorer clinical condition and increased risk of mortality in patients [17]. Besides, nurses' workload also increases as the conventional approach to CRRT circuit replacement requires returning the blood to the patient and sealing the vascular access with anticoagulation before a new CRRT circuit replacement starts to prevent catheter malfunction [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%