Many papers study cryonics, its feasibility and effectiveness as the only currently available method for preserving life beyond the declaration of clinical death. The estimated resuscitation times of each patient and how this affects the selection of the appropriate temperature for cryopreservation is introduced. The analysis of enzymatic reaction times proves that it is not necessary to cryopreserve at -196°C but at a higher temperatures, This is the main contribution of this work.The scope of the analysis covers the use of which substances, cryoprotectants, as well as inhibitors, should be used as well as the enzyme reaction times that take place at different temperatures.Not only the technical details are analyzed, but also the legal perspective. Cryopreserved subjects are considered "patients" and not lifeless bodies. It is explained why this is necessary and why it should be communicated at a social level through state policies, as well as the absolute necessity to apply an immediate legal and juridical modification that allows starting the procedures without delay before the metabolic arrest of the patient, and why the World Health Organization already guarantees this in its constitution.The aim of this paper is to confirm the cryonics method as a current solution to pause biological time and give the patient a chance, which by right, to preserve his or her life.