2007
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular blockage in cut roses in a suspension ofPseudomonas fluorescens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pseudomonas fluorescence did not prolong cut roses longevity; instead, increasing bacterial concentration decreased total water uptake and vase lives [35].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pseudomonas fluorescence did not prolong cut roses longevity; instead, increasing bacterial concentration decreased total water uptake and vase lives [35].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 87%
“…They found that cut roses in hydrogen-rich water (HRW) had longer vase life, and dominant bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens and Brevundimonas diminuta in (HRW) were related to vase life enhancement [ 16 ]. However, Robinson et al (2007) had the opposite results that adding Pseudomonas fluorescence did not prolong cut roses longevity; instead, increasing bacterial concentration decreased total water uptake and vase lives [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decline in the increase in daily fresh weight of cut flowers can be the result of a rise in the number of bacteria in the vase solution (van Meeteren et al, 1999). An increase in the number of bacteria added to vase water has been shown to cause a reduction in water uptake (Robinson et al, 2007;Zagory & Reid, 1986). Microbial contamination and the metabolites from microbial organisms in vase water play a major role in vascular blockage, limiting postharvest life in many flower species, including Dendrobium (Brown et al, 1998;Loubaud & van Doorn, 2004;Maithong et al, 2018;van Doorn et al, 1989van Doorn et al, , 1991aYong & Ong, 1979).…”
Section: Vascular Blockage By Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to leaf water potential which varies greatly during a day depending on weather conditions and stomatal behaviour, the water potential of stems is more stable and tends to vary depending on the overall water status of plants. Among commercially available instruments for measuring stem water potential, the PSY1 Stem Psychrometer has been commonly used in the field and has proven to be accurate and reliable [37][38][39]. This device enables continuous measurement by attaching to the sapwood of the stem.…”
Section: Stem Water Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%