2016
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular bursts enhance permeability of tumour blood vessels and improve nanoparticle delivery

Abstract: Enhanced permeability in tumours is thought to result from malformed vascular walls with leaky cell-to-cell junctions. This assertion is backed by studies using electron microscopy and polymer casts that show incomplete pericyte coverage of tumour vessels and the presence of intercellular gaps. However, this gives the impression that tumour permeability is static amid a chaotic tumour environment. Using intravital confocal laser scanning microscopy we show that the permeability of tumour blood vessels includes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
229
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
229
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, alleviating the systemic toxicity of anticancer cabazitaxel agent facilitated the dose intensification and thereby improved efficacy. On the other hand, we can expect that once accumulated within cancerous tissues via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (47)(48)(49), the pSNM scaffold may prolong the exposure of tumor cells to cabazitaxel at therapeutically relevant concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, alleviating the systemic toxicity of anticancer cabazitaxel agent facilitated the dose intensification and thereby improved efficacy. On the other hand, we can expect that once accumulated within cancerous tissues via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (47)(48)(49), the pSNM scaffold may prolong the exposure of tumor cells to cabazitaxel at therapeutically relevant concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pressure gradient [49]. Both 30 nm-sized and 70 nm-sized nanoparticles were erupted into tumor interstitial spaces.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both 30 nm-sized and 70 nm-sized nanoparticles were erupted into tumor interstitial spaces. The 30 nm-sized nanoparticle quickly diffused away but the 70 nm-sized nanoparticle was trapped in stroma-rich barriers [49]. Cancer cells mostly surround blood vessels in some clinical tumor (e.g.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The prevalence of endothelial gaps in human tumors is uncertain, and nanoparticle eflux may be opposed by the dense microenvironment, hypoxia, and high interstitial pressure characteristic of tumors. 5–9 Nanoparticle delivery may also be affected by the kinetics of transient vascular leaks 10 and intermittent perfusion/cycling hypoxia. 11,12 Along with a lack of clear benefit in clinical trials, nanomedicines have experienced a slow rate of FDA approvals and limited use in patients, suggesting the need to consider new approaches beyond passive delivery by the EPR effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%