Vascular conspicuity differs among injection protocols and scanner types for canine multiphasic abdominal computed tomographic angiography

Abstract

Multiphasic multidetector computed tomographic angiography is a standard diagnostic test for canine abdominal vascular disorders. Three imaging protocols have been previously described. The test-bolus protocol allows precise timing but can be time consuming to perform. Bolus-tracking software is fast and easy to use but can be problematic for exact timing of vascular phases. A recently described fixed-injection-duration protocol is not influenced by body weight and provides a wider temporal window for arterial acquisitions. Objectives of this retrospective and prospective, multicentric, method comparison study were to determine which of the three multidetector computed tomographic angiography protocols allows best vascular conspicuity of the canine abdomen and to assess the influence of different multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanners on study quality. Triple-phase multidetector computed tomographic angiography canine abdominal studies from 30 dogs were retrospectively retrieved from three different institutions. Each institution performed one of the three computed tomographic angiography protocols (4-row and 16-row multidetector CT). Prospectively, the three protocols were also acquired with similar conditions on a 64-row MDCT in 21 dogs. Main abdominal vessels were scored by blinded readers for each phase. The fixed-injection-duration protocol had the best combined arterial and portal vascular conspicuity on scanners of limited speed, while the test-bolus protocol provided the best overall vascular conspicuity on 64-row multidetector CT scanner. The quality of arterial studies performed on 64-row MDCT scanner was improved compared to the ones performed on four- to 16-row multidetector CT scanners. Findings supported the fixed-injection-duration protocol as the best compromise between an ideal portal vascular enhancement and an easily reproducible protocol on scanners with low and high number of detector rows.

Four‐dimensional CT excretory urography is an accurate technique for diagnosis of canine ureteral ectopia

“…Iodinated nonionic contrast medium (Iopamidol, Niopam 350, Bracco UK Ltd) was injected intravenously into the cephalic vein at a dose of 700 mg iodine/kg with a power injector (Empower CTA Injector System Bracco Entronque Picacho‐ajusco 130, Jardines en la Montaña, 14210 Tlalpan, CDMX, Mexico), set with a maximum pressure of 325 psi 20 …”

Intrahepatic venous collaterals in dogs with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunts are associated with focal shunt or hepatic vein narrowing

“…Arterial phase scans can be technically challenging to obtain, but are possible with most CT scanners. A mixed retrospective and prospective study showed that the quality of arterial phase studies performed with a power injector on 64‐detector CT scanners are superior relative to scans performed on 4‐ or 16‐detector scanners 14 . An alternative technique for acquiring arterial phases involves a test bolus, and often produces diagnostic‐quality results.…”

“…A mixed retrospective and prospective study showed that the quality of arterial phase studies performed with a power injector on 64-detector CT scanners are superior relative to scans performed on 4-or 16-detector scanners. 14 An alternative technique for acquiring arterial phases involves a test bolus, and often produces diagnosticquality results. The drawbacks of this technique are that it can be timeconsuming and requires multiple scans.…”

Canine intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion into the systemic circulation is commonly through primary hepatic veins as assessed with CT angiography

“…35 The detection of small vessels such as these may also rely on adequate opacification with contrast, and so will be affected by the contrast protocol used. 36 In this study, the contrast protocol, including injection rate and scan timing, was variable between the different institutions. While the major portal branches and hepatic veins were adequately opacified in all dogs included, it is possible that some smaller additional shunting vessels were not seen due to inadequate contrast protocol optimization and standardization.…”