2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2010.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor +936C/T and +405G/C Polymorphisms and Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous metaanalyses performed by Xu et al, 35 Hong et al, 36 and Liu et al 37 contained one study related to OC; those by Cao et al 38 and Hong et al 39 included 2 studies that tested OC. None of these 5 meta-analyses focused exclusively on OC, and none of them conducted subgroup analysis for OC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous metaanalyses performed by Xu et al, 35 Hong et al, 36 and Liu et al 37 contained one study related to OC; those by Cao et al 38 and Hong et al 39 included 2 studies that tested OC. None of these 5 meta-analyses focused exclusively on OC, and none of them conducted subgroup analysis for OC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEGF and related proteins are critical for development, growth and metastasis of tumors, and their expression levels have been demonstrated to be predictive of resistance to treatment 30-32. Genetic polymorphisms in the promoter region, 5'UTR, and 3'UTR of the VEGF gene are associated with VEGF levels in plasma or tumors, and therefore can be diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers for patients with tumors 20-23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genotypes of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an endothelial cell-specific mitogen, were evaluated 16, since clinical reports suggested that their genetic variations have the potential to influence the expression of VEGF, and thereby the growth of tumors, metastatic spread, and response to treatment 20-23; however, they failed to predict the response 16. Obviously, the final goal of cancer chemotherapy is an improvement in long-term survival, not a short-term clinical response, so parameters predicting prognosis have been absolutely imperative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaplan-Meier mortality curves were created to exhibit differences in mortality by selected risk factors. Quantitative synthesis of all relevant studies was performed and the methods used have been described in detail in previous studies (16,17). The HRs of time-to-event data were directly extracted from the original study or were read off survival curves to estimate the logHR and its variance, as suggested by Parmar et al (18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%