2000
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-200036001-00084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vasoactive Peptide-Regulated Gene Expression During Osteoblastic Differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although overexpression of CNP was targeted to chondrocytes in our rescue experiments, early onset of CNP-Tg expression from the CP might have been able to affect bone metabolism at the earlier stage of skeletogenesis [17] and may have continued to affect osteoblasts or osteoclasts near the growth plate cartilage in the later stage of skeletogenesis. Whereas several in vitro effects of CNP on osteoblastic cell lineages or osteoclasts have been reported [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], the in vivo effects of CNP on bone metabolism remain elusive; and further experiments are now ongoing in our laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although overexpression of CNP was targeted to chondrocytes in our rescue experiments, early onset of CNP-Tg expression from the CP might have been able to affect bone metabolism at the earlier stage of skeletogenesis [17] and may have continued to affect osteoblasts or osteoclasts near the growth plate cartilage in the later stage of skeletogenesis. Whereas several in vitro effects of CNP on osteoblastic cell lineages or osteoclasts have been reported [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], the in vivo effects of CNP on bone metabolism remain elusive; and further experiments are now ongoing in our laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be argued that, if osteoblasts were to differentiate closer to the vessels, bone deposition would be eccentric and not concentric with respect to the vascular framework; but this suggestion by no means explains the mechanism by which preosteoblasts "sense" the position of the vessels. Several factors may be involved, such as O 2 tension (Brighton et al 1991;Lennon et al 2001), endothelial-cell-derived cytokines (i.e., endothelin-1) (Inoue et al 2000;Kasperk et al 1997;Sasaki and Hong 1993) and growth factors (ECGF) (Canalis et al 1989;Guenther et al 1986;Streeten and Brandi 1990;Villanueva and Nimni 1990) and dendritic stromal cells connecting vascular endothelium to the bone surfaces (Palazzini et al 1998), but their precise role and mechanism of action have yet to be to defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…without mechanoreceptors (Marotti, 1996;Ferretti et al 2002), thus making the mechanical strains ineffectual (likely to be already existing during static osteogenesis) since they cannot be sensed. In contrast, SO is responsive to cytokines such as endothelin I and/or vascular growth factors (ECGF) released by the endothelium (Streeten & Brandi, 1990;Villanueva & Nimni, 1990;Kasperk et al 1997;Inoue et al 2000) or by platelets (Canalis et al 1992;Chaudhary et al 2004), which are mitogens for osteoprogenitor cells. The primary function of SO is to provide a rigid scaffold containing osteocytes to DO-osteoblast laminae (Ferretti et al 2002(Ferretti et al , 2006Palumbo et al 2003Palumbo et al , 2004Marotti, 2004;Marotti et al 2010); therefore, in DO, mechanical factors can have a crucial role in transducing mechanical stresses into biological signals.…”
Section: Lindsaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was demonstrated by us for the first time over the last decade in a series of structural and ultrastructural investigations, there exist two different mechanisms of bone formation, occurring in sequence during intramembranous ossification in both physiologic and pathologic conditions (Ferretti et al 2002(Ferretti et al , 2006Palumbo et al 2003Palumbo et al , 2004Marotti, 2004;Marotti et al 2010). We named these two processes of bone formation static osteogenesis (SO) and dynamic osteogenesis (DO), respectively, because the former is characterized by pluristratified cords of 'stationary' osteoblasts which differentiate by inductive stimuli (Streeten & Brandi, 1990;Villanueva & Nimni, 1990;Kasperk et al 1997;Inoue et al 2000) at a fairly constant distance from the network of blood capillaries, without moving during their transformation into osteocytes from the differentiation site; the latter being instead performed by the well-known typical monostratified laminae of 'movable' osteoblasts. The temporal sequence of events is as follows: first, variously polarized stationary osteoblasts are irregularly arranged inside cords and give rise (in the same place where they differentiate) to osteocytes clustered within confluent lacunae, thus allowing the formation of a preliminary trabecular woven bone, not valid from the mechanical viewpoint due to its too-high random cellularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%