“…The results described above indicate that the contractions of the hUA in response to ETs is mediated by a ETA receptor type, since: (i) the order of potency of agonists (ET-1 ET-2 > > ET-3) is suggestive of a typical ETA receptor: indeed, ET-1 is more active than ET-3 by 1.5 log unit, a difference of affinity that is similar to that observed in pure ETA systems, such as the rat aorta (1.9 log unit, Sumner et al, 1992) and the rabbit carotid artery (1.7 log unit, Calo et al, 1996) (see also recent results obtained by Bacon & Davenport, with binding assays in the ETA receptors of the human aorta, where ET-1 (KD 0.60 + 0.20 nM) shows higher affinity than ET-3 (KD 8.21 + 1.62 nM)); (ii) BQ123, which has been shown to act as competitive antagonist of ETA receptors in animals (Ihara et al, 1992), inhibits the effect of ET-1 in a competitive manner (Schild plot in Figure 3) with a pA2 value of 6.9 which is similar to that obtained in other human tissues (Maguire et al, 1994;Maguire & Davenport, 1995) (see also results of binding experiments by Bacon & Davenport, 1996). These results are at variance with those reported by Bodelsson & Stjernquist (1993), who found BQ123 to be inactive against ET-1 in the hUA.…”