1988
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.77.5.1072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vasodilatation by calcitonin gene-related peptide and by substance P: a comparison of their effects on resistance and capacitance vessels of human forearms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CGRP also caused venodilatation which, in agreement with the arterial studies, was less potent than adrenomedullin. This contrasts with a previous study in which CGRP produced no increase in venous diameter at doses of 5 pmol ml −1 min −1 or less [19]. Although, in the present study, we used up to 10 pmol ml these two peptides act at different receptors [7].…”
Section: Protocol 1: Arterial Infusion Studies and Blood Flow In Forecontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…CGRP also caused venodilatation which, in agreement with the arterial studies, was less potent than adrenomedullin. This contrasts with a previous study in which CGRP produced no increase in venous diameter at doses of 5 pmol ml −1 min −1 or less [19]. Although, in the present study, we used up to 10 pmol ml these two peptides act at different receptors [7].…”
Section: Protocol 1: Arterial Infusion Studies and Blood Flow In Forecontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…SP provoked dose-dependent vasodilation which was characterized by a fast onset and a decline during ongoing stimulation as shown before in microdialysis experiments [23]and following intra-arterial infusion of SP [32]. The vasodilatory effect of SP is mediated by NK1 receptors [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…24 In our previous study, 24 we excluded the possibility that repeated infusion of substance P results in attenuated forearm vasodilatation owing to tachyphylaxis. 24,30 These findings indicate that substance P-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is mediated primarily by endothelial factor(s) other than NO or PGI 2 . In the present study, TEA attenuated the substance P-induced forearm vasodilatation, suggesting that substance P-induced forearm vasodilatation is mediated primarily by EDHF.…”
Section: Inokuchi Et Al Edhf In the Human Forearm 921mentioning
confidence: 87%