2022
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.23048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vasopressin and Methylprednisolone vs Placebo and Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the VAM-IHCA Study provided an insufficient dose of vasopressin in the intervention group. 31 A difference between our study and those two recent studies 29 30 by Granfeldt et al and Saghafi et al is that we evaluated the overall impact of vasopressin in cardiac arrest. There is no single optimal method suitable for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the VAM-IHCA Study provided an insufficient dose of vasopressin in the intervention group. 31 A difference between our study and those two recent studies 29 30 by Granfeldt et al and Saghafi et al is that we evaluated the overall impact of vasopressin in cardiac arrest. There is no single optimal method suitable for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Therefore, the VAM-IHCA Study provided an insufficient dose of vasopressin in the intervention group. 31 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation