2006
DOI: 10.1134/s1063782606050186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VCSELs based on arrays of sub-monolayer InGaAs quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gain maximum redshift is about seven times faster than the cavity mode, which confirms the strong thermal dependence of the gain-cavity detuning. The perfect spectral alignment of the cavity mode with the gain maximum ( λ(T ) = 0) occurs at a temperature of T * G ∼ 311 K. However, if the detuning is estimated based on the temperature dependence of the wavelength of the EL peak, the zero detuning is reached at a temperature of 280 K, which cannot agree with the efficient operation of the investigated VCSEL at elevated temperatures [10]. Note that the temperature corresponding to the minimum threshold current T I does not coincide with the temperature of zero gaincavity detuning T * G , as is commonly assumed for the VCSEL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gain maximum redshift is about seven times faster than the cavity mode, which confirms the strong thermal dependence of the gain-cavity detuning. The perfect spectral alignment of the cavity mode with the gain maximum ( λ(T ) = 0) occurs at a temperature of T * G ∼ 311 K. However, if the detuning is estimated based on the temperature dependence of the wavelength of the EL peak, the zero detuning is reached at a temperature of 280 K, which cannot agree with the efficient operation of the investigated VCSEL at elevated temperatures [10]. Note that the temperature corresponding to the minimum threshold current T I does not coincide with the temperature of zero gaincavity detuning T * G , as is commonly assumed for the VCSEL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In spite of the fact that the dielectric or undoped semiconductor distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) and intra-cavity contacts can considerably minimize the free carrier absorption losses in present QD VCSELs [8], such VCSEL design is much more complicated as compared to that of commercial 0.85 µm QW VCSEL with doped Al x Ga 1−x As DBRs. We have recently demonstrated the possibility of using high surface density InGaAs QD arrays formed by sub-monolayer (SML) deposition as an active region for high-performance oxide-confined 0.98 µm VCSELs [10]. In spite of the remarkable progress achieved for QD VCSELs, the performance and scaling of characteristics of any type of VCSEL are seriously limited by their thermal behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) Recently, single-mode InGaAs SML QD VCSELs with a room-temperature output power as high as 4 mW have been demonstrated. 11) However, single-mode operation of the InGaAs SML QD VCSEL with PhC is still yet to be realized. In this paper, we report our results for InGaAs QD PhC-VCSELs in the 990 nm range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%