2011
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2011)018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vector boson pair production at the LHC

Abstract: We present phenomenological results for vector boson pair production at the LHC, obtained using the parton-level next-to-leading order program MCFM. We include the implementation of a new process in the code, pp → γγ, and important updates to existing processes. We incorporate fragmentation contributions in order to allow for the experimental isolation of photons in γγ, W γ, and Zγ production and also account for gluon-gluon initial state contributions for all relevant processes. We present results for a varie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
610
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 744 publications
(629 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
17
610
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross sections are calculated for the dominant diboson and top-quark processes as follows: the inclusive WW cross section is calculated to NLO in α S with MCFM [51]; nonresonant gluon fusion is calculated and modeled to leading order (LO) in α S with GG2VV, including both WW and ZZ production and their interference; tt production is normalized to the calculation at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in α S with resummation of higher-order terms to the next-to-next-to-leading logarithms (NNLL), evaluated with TOP++2.0 [52]; and single-top processes are normalized to NNLL following the calculations from Refs. [53][54][55] for the s-channel, t-channel, and Wt processes, respectively.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross sections are calculated for the dominant diboson and top-quark processes as follows: the inclusive WW cross section is calculated to NLO in α S with MCFM [51]; nonresonant gluon fusion is calculated and modeled to leading order (LO) in α S with GG2VV, including both WW and ZZ production and their interference; tt production is normalized to the calculation at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in α S with resummation of higher-order terms to the next-to-next-to-leading logarithms (NNLL), evaluated with TOP++2.0 [52]; and single-top processes are normalized to NNLL following the calculations from Refs. [53][54][55] for the s-channel, t-channel, and Wt processes, respectively.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reconstruct jets using the anti-k T algorithm from FastJet [53][54][55] with R anti−k T = 0.4, which gives us a very moderate geometric separation of two jets. When dealing with photons in a QCD environment some familiar subtleties have to be considered [56][57][58][59][60][61]: a photon can arise from non-perturbative fragmentation. Those photons are not useful in our case since our focus is obviously not on QED corrections to multi-jet production rates.…”
Section: Jhep02(2012)030mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same rapidity range, the POWHEG+PYTHIA pp simulation predicts 94.0 ± 4.7 nb after scaling with the number of nucleons in the Pb nucleus (A = 208), which agrees with the measured value. The left hand-side of Figure 2 shows the differential cross section of Z boson production as a function of rapidity in the center-of-mass frame compared to predictions from MCFM generator [17]. The MCFM predictions are calculated with MSTW2008NLO [18] free proton PDF set with and without the nuclear modification from EPS09 [19] or DSSZ [20] nPDF sets and scaled by A.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%