Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Instrumentation Technology Conference (Cat. No.03CH37412)
DOI: 10.1109/imtc.2003.1207960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vector locus of an equivalent radius of the root in growing plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the correlation coefficients between the actual and predicted moisture contents using the least-square method based on equations 2, 3, and 4 at different frequencies. The correlation was poor in the low-frequency range from 0.12 to 20 kHz, which might be because electric current at extremely low frequencies rarely passes through plant tissues (Zhang et al, 1990;Yamada et al, 2003). In the highfrequency range from 80 to 100 kHz, the correlation coefficients were all less than 0.68.…”
Section: Moisture Content Detection Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 shows the correlation coefficients between the actual and predicted moisture contents using the least-square method based on equations 2, 3, and 4 at different frequencies. The correlation was poor in the low-frequency range from 0.12 to 20 kHz, which might be because electric current at extremely low frequencies rarely passes through plant tissues (Zhang et al, 1990;Yamada et al, 2003). In the highfrequency range from 80 to 100 kHz, the correlation coefficients were all less than 0.68.…”
Section: Moisture Content Detection Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From the absolute values of the two coefficients, resistance had a higher effect on the prediction of moisture content than capacitance in the model. The reason might be that the measurements of capacitance and resistance were affected by different tissues in the leaves, causing different results (Yamada et al, 2003).Therefore, resistance can be considered a more important parameter than capacitance for the prediction of moisture content. Of course, compared with linear regression, the MLR analysis also had disadvantages, including high mathematical complexity, but this drawback did not affect the research.…”
Section: Moisture Content Detection Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation