2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vector-valued function estimation by grammatical evolution for autonomous robot control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An appropriate and good method constructs classification programs in a human-readable format using the technique of grammatical evolution [9]. Grammatical evolution is an evolutionary process that has been applied with success in many areas, such as music composition [10], economics [11], symbolic regression [12], robot control [13], and combinatorial optimization [14]. The method used here was initially described in [15] and the code is also described in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate and good method constructs classification programs in a human-readable format using the technique of grammatical evolution [9]. Grammatical evolution is an evolutionary process that has been applied with success in many areas, such as music composition [10], economics [11], symbolic regression [12], robot control [13], and combinatorial optimization [14]. The method used here was initially described in [15] and the code is also described in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these is the work of Koza (1992), who carried out the first substantial studies of GP across many problem areas and created the canonical tree-based form of GP that is the foundation for many variants of and applications of GP (Montana 1995;O'Neill and Ryan 2001;Ferreira 2001;He et al 2011a, b;Du et al 2014;Alfonseca and Gil 2013;Burbidge and Wilson 2014;Fernandez-Blanco et al 2013;Oltean et al 2009;Howard et al 2011;Harman et al 2012;Langdon and Harman 2015;Mckay et al 2010) even today. The notion of types was introduced into GP by Montana (1995) in the Strongly Typed Genetic Programming (STGP) system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these issues and allow the use of a system of types in GP, Montana (1995) allowed the typing terminals and operator arguments in the second phase of the development process of GP, presenting the so-called STGP approach; however, no basic change was made to the program representations when compared to the approach of Koza. Finally, the work by O'Neill and Ryan (2001) on GE aroused a wide range of interest among GP researchers and practitioners (Burbidge and Wilson 2014;Hugosson et al 2010;Oltean et al 2009;RiscoMartin et al 2014;Wilson and Kaur 2009). In fact, compared to other two kinds of GP methods discussed, grammar-related approaches can be best suited to type descriptions and recursive program generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%