1966
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.33.4.588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vectorcardiographic Studies in Acquired Valvular Disease with Reference to the Diagnosis of Right Ventricular Hypertrophy

Abstract: THE ROUTINE 12 lead electrocardiogram is not always reliable in demonstrating right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH), this is particularly true in patients with acquired valvular disease, or with mild or moderate RVH.'12 Such discrepancies are understandable when one considers that the most commonly used criteria for RVH are based on voltages,3-5 and that only in cases of severe or massive RVH can the electromotive forces generated in the right ventricle (RV) counterbalance those produced in the left ventricle (L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These chaniges were of course more pronovunced in the cases with moderate and severe degrees of right ventricular hypertrophy. 17 In our study we did not find significant correlations between magnituide of the spatial vectors and pressure gradients similar to the ones described by Hugenholz and Gamboa1 " for congenital heart disease, but it must be remembered that congenital heart disease differs greatly from our group with acquired heart disease in the following points: (1) The group with congenital heart disease studied had only a single lesion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These chaniges were of course more pronovunced in the cases with moderate and severe degrees of right ventricular hypertrophy. 17 In our study we did not find significant correlations between magnituide of the spatial vectors and pressure gradients similar to the ones described by Hugenholz and Gamboa1 " for congenital heart disease, but it must be remembered that congenital heart disease differs greatly from our group with acquired heart disease in the following points: (1) The group with congenital heart disease studied had only a single lesion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, the depth of the S wave was considerably decreased in the group complicated with mitral stenosis (V) and supposedly with right ventricular hypertrophy. 17 Lead Z. In lead Z the R wave in the group with AI (I) was greatest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Application of P wave criteria required exclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation resulting in a smaller test sample, thus necessitating a decrease in the number of parameters that could be validly used. 9 The use of P wave criteria resulted in significant improvement in separation between normal and MS (45 to 60%) and between PE and MS (48 to 63%). No improvement in recognition rate with rising pulmonary artery pressure was seen in the separation of pulmonary emphysema from mitral stenosis using five QRS criteria alone (table 6).…”
Section: Multivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%