1976
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7061(76)90071-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetal cover to estimate soil erosion hazard in Rhodesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
103
2
12

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
14
103
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…4. The protective action induced by vegetation, beside the improvement of the physical and chemical properties of soils due to the biomass addition (already highlighted in the surveys performed on bare soils), contributed to reduce sediment concentration in the collected runoff volumes (on the average by 40%): this result matches the outcomes of other Authors (Mueller-Dumbois and Ellemberg [16]; Elwell and Stocking [7]; Riezebos and Epema [18]; Smith and Mullins [21]; Sanchez and Puigdefabregas [19]; Deuchras et al [5]; Lasanta et al [11]; Barthés and Roose [1]; Casermeiro et al [2]) in relation to sediment yield observed in artificial or natural slopes with different vegetal coverage and exposed both to natural and simulated rainfalls. The correlation between the sediment yield and the vegetal canopy cover was evident only for treated soils (r 2 = 0.78; r 2 = 0.39 for control plots), fig.…”
Section: Hydrological Effects In Vegetated Soilssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…4. The protective action induced by vegetation, beside the improvement of the physical and chemical properties of soils due to the biomass addition (already highlighted in the surveys performed on bare soils), contributed to reduce sediment concentration in the collected runoff volumes (on the average by 40%): this result matches the outcomes of other Authors (Mueller-Dumbois and Ellemberg [16]; Elwell and Stocking [7]; Riezebos and Epema [18]; Smith and Mullins [21]; Sanchez and Puigdefabregas [19]; Deuchras et al [5]; Lasanta et al [11]; Barthés and Roose [1]; Casermeiro et al [2]) in relation to sediment yield observed in artificial or natural slopes with different vegetal coverage and exposed both to natural and simulated rainfalls. The correlation between the sediment yield and the vegetal canopy cover was evident only for treated soils (r 2 = 0.78; r 2 = 0.39 for control plots), fig.…”
Section: Hydrological Effects In Vegetated Soilssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Tank evaporation (A-tank) records are unavailable in the study region. However, two stations located in a drier climate, 50 km towards the west (Anguil), and in a cooler and moister climate, 300 km towards the southeast (Balcarce) achieve average values of 2009 and 1011 mm/yr for 1976-2006. Even the lowest of these values is higher than those typically reported for annual crops with unlimited water supply (Carcova et al, 2000;Gardiol et al, 2003), suggesting that pond evaporation could become a more effective vapour evacuation pathway than transpiration to remove water once flooding expands.…”
Section: Groundwater and Floods At The District Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floods were frequently attributed to the conversion of woodlands and grasslands into grazing, cropping and urban lands. Water runoff typically decreases exponentially as plant cover increases (Elwell and Stocking, 1976;Lee and Skogerboe, 1985;Francis and Thornes, 1990) and paired catchment investigations on the hydrological role of vegetation show a general trend of declining evapotranspiration and increasing water yield as plant cover get reduced and as vegetation shifts across the forests-grasslands-annual crop sequence (Bosch and Hewlett, 1982;Calder, 1998;Zhang et al, 2001;Andréassian, 2004). Models and observations indicate that large trees in catchments may deplete groundwater reserves where their roots reach the water table, yet…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elwell & Stocking (1976) determinaram que com a perda de 70% da cobertura original, a erosão se elevaria drasticamente devido ao maior impacto da chuva sobre o solo. Nosso estudo detectou uma diferença de 571 mm (37%) de chuva entre a pastagem e a floresta.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified