Environmental Pollution
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4615-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation and Acidification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whole-watershed ammonium sulfate treatments reduced EMM growth of northern red oak, red maple, and tulip poplar relative to an adjacent control watershed, but did not affect the growth of black cherry (Figure 4). The observed species-specific responses to treatment are generally consistent with previous tree ring studies at Fernow, which reported greater tulip poplar growth in the control catchment (Jensen et al, 2014) and comparable growth of black cherry after the first years of treatment (DeWalle et al, 2006).…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Tree Growthsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whole-watershed ammonium sulfate treatments reduced EMM growth of northern red oak, red maple, and tulip poplar relative to an adjacent control watershed, but did not affect the growth of black cherry (Figure 4). The observed species-specific responses to treatment are generally consistent with previous tree ring studies at Fernow, which reported greater tulip poplar growth in the control catchment (Jensen et al, 2014) and comparable growth of black cherry after the first years of treatment (DeWalle et al, 2006).…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Tree Growthsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, analyses of tree growth response to acidification treatments at Fernow have been mixed or inconclusive. For example, DeWalle et al (2006) reported that growth of black cherry ( Prunus serotina ) and tulip poplar ( Liriodendron tulipifera ) increased in the treated watershed relative to the control in the first 7 years, perhaps due to N fertilization or base cation mobilization, but growth rates declined thereafter. Jensen et al (2014) reported species‐specific differences in growth, with black cherry exhibiting significantly greater growth in the treated watershed until 2003, and tulip poplar growing consistently faster in the control watershed from 1989–2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that soil freezing at temperatures commonly experienced at this site can further increase net nitrification in soils already exhibiting high nitrification from N saturation, potentially exacerbating problems associated with N saturation, such as decreased growth rates of dominant hardwood species, which has been demonstrated at FEF (May et al 2005;DeWalle et al 2006).…”
Section: Implications For Soil Freezing In An N-saturated Hardwood Fomentioning
confidence: 62%
“…At FEF, the <40-year-old stand on WS3 would be considered to be in an aggrading phase by most forest models (e.g., [41]) and, indeed, there was an initial positive growth response to the initiation of the N treatment [50]. However, current growth rates of some of the dominant tree species (e.g., P. serotina, L. tulipifera, and A. rubrum) on WS3 have decreased by as much as 50% [42] and have done so at a time when stream NO 3 − is also declining, indicating that patterns of decline in stream NO 3 − are not the result of increased uptake by rapidly growing trees of an aggrading ecosystem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%